With this being the opening weekend of the summer tourist season, and Monday having been the actual kick off day, unless you really had to be somewhere, like at a BBQ you got invited to, your best bet on Cape Cod was to stay home and let the seasonal residents and their visiting relatives have the roads.

With me having really basic cable, that meant my being subjected to war movie marathons and tribute shows, or some sporting events in which I had no interest.

The daily Green acres, I Dream of Jeanie, and Bewitched hour blocks were put on hold until Tuesday, and without a TV schedule, I had to channel surf occasionally and wait to see what was coming on at the top of any given hour.

At one point I surfed to what is usually a movie station to see what was coming up, and had to sit through the last few minutes of some religious guy who was claiming that Pope Francis has no real concept of what it is to be Christian, and that his calling Mahmoud Abbas an “angel of peace” was proof that, unlike other Christian denominations like his own Southern Baptists, the Roman Catholic Church held an historic monopoly on anti-Jewish sentiment.

I guess, he chose to ignore the attitude toward Jews that was prevalent in his part of the country until the facts of the Holocaust guilted many into changing those attitudes.

This was not the first time that Pope Francis has been chastised for his not being “christian” enough for certain politicians who claim a monopoly on religious thought.

Meanwhile, a bipartisan resolution that was written in December 2013 to honor Pope Francis for his work towards social justice and his election, House resolution 440, was referred to the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and has been languishing there ever since.

Democratic Representative John Larson of Connecticut and Republican Representative Pete King of New York had written to Boehner last July to ask him to put the resolution to a vote.

“To my knowledge this would be an historic first. I ask that you take a look at a bipartisan resolution introduced by Representative Peter King and myself, acknowledging the first Pope from the Americas … it is my sincere hope that you will consider this resolution for the suspension calendar for a vote.”

The pope is just too liberal for some.

The pope, you see, has criticized unfettered capitalism and trickle-down economics, and has called for a more equal distribution of wealth.

“Some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naive trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacra¬lized workings of the prevailing economic system. People are still waiting.”
There is a typical viagra tablet conviction that the sexual fulfillment is very high and fuels the sexual activity. After getting signals from brain the penile, muscles get relaxed cheap professional viagra when the brain sends signals to male organ. These stress best generic tadalafil factors and stress of any other kind can also cause ED. http://djpaulkom.tv/video-da-mafia-6ix-x-bone-thugs-n-harmony-on-the-massacre-tour/ cialis viagra online Licorice root is the excellent blood purifier herbs that can help you increase the length and girth of erection in men.
The pope is scheduled to be in the United States in roughly four months to speak at the Catholic Church’s World Meeting of Families, which will be held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and John Boehner has invited him to speak to congress.

In March 2014, when he had invited the pope to speak to Congress, John Boehner had written,

“His tireless call for the protection of the most vulnerable among us—the ailing, the disadvantaged, the unemployed, the impoverished, the unborn—has awakened hearts on every continent.
His social teachings, rooted in ‘the joy of the gospel,’ have prompted careful reflection and vigorous dialogue among people of all ideologies and religious views in the United States and throughout a rapidly changing world, particularly among those who champion human dignity, freedom, and social justice.
These principles are among the fundamentals of the American Idea. And though our nation sometimes fails to live up to these principles, at our best we give them new life as we seek the common good. Many in the United States believe these principles are undermined by ‘crony capitalism’ and the ongoing centralization of political power in the institutions of our federal government, which threaten to disrupt the delicate balance between the twin virtues of subsidiarity and solidarity”.
Fast forward to this year, and you have Republicans upset because of the pope’s recognition of a Palestinian state.

They do not like the leaking of religion into politics.

“It’s interesting how the Vatican has gotten so political when ultimately the Vatican ought to be working to lead people to Jesus Christ and salvation, and that’s what the Church is supposed to do,” according to Republican Jeff Duncan of South Carolina.

Republicans have objected to marriage equality, not on Constitutional grounds, but religious ones, and have even advocated ignoring the Supreme Court if it decides in favor of it.

They have objected to a woman’s right to choose by introducing ever more restrictive abortion bills based on religion, not science.

And, they have advocated for selective discrimination and the special right to not have to follow the laws of the land in the name of “religious freedom”.

They want to wed religion to politics, but object to a Christian religious leader advocating that people who claim the United States is a Christian country exercise Christian principles.

Of course they cannot be too happy with the pope when he said,

“In ideologies there is not Jesus: in his tenderness, his love, his meekness. And ideologies are rigid, always. Of every sign: rigid. And when a Christian becomes a disciple of the ideology, he has lost the faith: he is no longer a disciple of Jesus, he is a disciple of this attitude of thought… For this reason Jesus said to them: ‘You have taken away the key of knowledge.’ The knowledge of Jesus is transformed into an ideological and also moralistic knowledge, because these close the door with many requirements. The faith becomes ideology and ideology frightens, ideology chases away the people, distances, distances the people and distances of the Church of the people. But it is a serious illness, this of ideological Christians. It is an illness, but it is not new.”