The Obama administration wants to clarify the EPA’s regulatory powers under the Clean Water Act.
Congressional Republicans are one step closer to blocking that. Just this week, the Senate Environment and Public Works committee voted 11-9 to pass a bill that would effectively repeal the administration’s recently announced regulations for water pollution.
Who needs clean water, anyway.
The vote was split along party lines.
In May the president had released the Waters for the United States Rule, which, according to the EPA, “ensures that waters protected under the Clean Water Act are more precisely defined, more predictably determined, and easier for businesses and industry to understand”, but doesn’t “protect any new types of waters, regulate most ditches, apply to groundwater, create any new permitting requirements for agriculture, or address land use or private property”.
Additionally, some of my the best sildenafil appalachianmagazine.com dearest friends are like sisters to me. Compared with common viagra online prices of $8 per pill, this still represents a significant discount. Papers need to be free viagra prescription pried out from underneath the moose’s huge hoofs. The male persons are facing this disease due to pollution, stress, and toxins) the sildenafil levitra http://appalachianmagazine.com/2016/07/05/4-lies-youve-probably-heard-about-black-snakes/ result is damage and the deterioration of your body similar to a car overheating after being run too hard and too long. In a press statement, the EPA explained, that The Clean Water Rule “does not regulate most ditches and does not regulate groundwater, shallow subsurface flows, or tile drains. It does not make changes to current policies on irrigation or water transfers or apply to erosion in a field. The Clean Water Rule addresses the pollution and destruction of waterways – not land use or private property rights.”
Republican Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming sponsored the bill because Republicans feel that the Waters for the United States Rule could adversely impact farmers and industry, and senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, chairman of the committee, believes that farmers in Oklahoma are more concerned about the Clean Water Rule than any other federal policy.
Barrasso’s bill will set guidelines for specific bodies of water that cannot be regulated, and requires that the EPA consult with state and local governments as well as private companies before rewriting the rule.
And we have seen how concerned private companies have been when it comes to the nation’s water by their concern when rivers have been polluted by industrial waste.
The bill now goes to the Senate with 60 votes needed to pass.
According to a press statement by Ally Fields, federal clean water advocate with Environment America, “The senators who voted against clean water today weren’t listening to the majority of Americans who want to see their rivers, streams, and livelihoods protected from pollution”.