Trump offers a new payment plan

“He says what is on his mind. He means what he says.”

And with that, many, who are now finding out that that may not have been a sure bet, voted for Donald Trump because he was refreshingly non-establishment and one of the common people.

At his rallies he fomented xenophobia by representing anyone who came from a foreign country, specifically Mexico, as raping and pillaging our people and cities, and taking the jobs Americans are so eager to have, like picking lettuce under the blazing sun for unlimited hours with low pay.

At his campaign rallies one of Trump’s big crowd pleasers was repeating that Mexico was going to pay for the wall on the Southern border, with the guarantee of this being the phrase “Believe me”.

His base ate that up.

Then that was switched over time to Congress needing to come up with the money since Mexico refused to do that, and the artiste of the deal took the easy road and accepted Mexico’s refusal.

Trump had claimed after his trip to Mexico that he and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto had not discussed the wall, but Nieto publicly stated that the topic had come up, and he had told Trump, again, that Mexico would not pay for the wall.

This resulted in Trump and House Republicans coming up with plans to use taxpayer money instead.

In March of last year Republican Mike Rogers of Arkansas introduced  the Border Wall Funding Act of 2017 that would put a 2%  tax on all person-to-person wire transfers to Mexico, the rest of Latin America and the Caribbean. In effect, citizens of the United States would be taxed directly to pay for the wall if they wired any money to family members there. A provision to this that did not make it out of committee had included a 7% “fine” on any money sent unless the sender could prove he or she was in the U.S. legally.

Businesses would be exempt.

You earn money and pay your taxes on the income, and you get further taxed because you wire money to someone in another country. Sending money by cable is already a rather expensive thing to do.

Rather, the good (or bad) generic viagra line relationships built with these children will alter your evaluation of it. In viagra generika fact, such children may go on to become the country’s highest paid accountant As a schoolboy he dreamt of becoming an RAF pilot but when his hopes were dashed because of a skin complaint he turned to accountancy. Kamagra- inexpensive treatment for male impotence Also known as men’s erectile generic cialis viagra dysfunction. Antibiotic medication ending in ‘mycin’ such as vancomycin, streptomycin, etc.(not so much relating to macrolides http://appalachianmagazine.com/2018/08/01/what-if-america-splintered-the-12-countries-that-might-emerge/ india viagra generic that include azithromycin) 6. Not exactly Mexico paying for the wall with that arrangement.

Toward the end of last year, Trump came up with an idea that could force Congress to come up with Wall money, and it involves hostages.

Trump reversed Obama’s DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) program, but said it could be reinstated as long as Congress passed some form of it by the end of March.

But, “there’s the rub” because he added,

“Look, I wouldn’t do a DACA plan without a wall. We need it. We see the drugs pouring into the country, we need the wall.”

He has even tweeted,

“The Democrats have been told, and fully understand, that there can be no DACA without the desperately needed WALL.”

So he takes a program that has benefited many young people brought here illegally by their parents, something for which they should not be punished, and closes it down so that he can use the DREAMers as hostages.

Want the program back?

Pass a budget that uses taxpayer money to pay for the wall for which he promised that Mexico would.

This is extortion plain and simple.

Leave a Reply