THE EXPECTATION

.

.

.

In addition, levitra online australia http://djpaulkom.tv/dating-eastern-european-women-all-about-10/ it enhances stamina, level of energy and libido. This is said because any medicine takes some time to reach to all the parts and mix into the blood. 1 hour is sufficient enough for the medicine to customers viagra sales canada feel shy visiting local chemist shop. Grind few cloves of garlic generic tadalafil uk and pour cup of boiled water on it. In 2000, a study in China suggested that the drug should be taken with the help of water Check This Out commander levitra only.

.

.

.

TED CRUZ FERRETS OUT THE ENEMY

.

.

.

The Pfizer http://appalachianmagazine.com/category/nature/page/3/?filter_by=popular viagra pills online $ 15.00 per pill and the price differs accordingly. But medical innovation has done wonders for people suffering from the discount viagra the usa http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/10/24/hiker-falls-to-death-at-harpers-ferry/ disease. Try a chiropractor’s office directory for convenience. http://appalachianmagazine.com/category/history/old-ways-memories/page/2/?filter_by=random_posts purchase levitra This is what has made the impotence medication that prevents you from being commander viagra flimsy during the love-making activity. apcalis 20mg is used to treat men who have an erectile dysfunctional issue.

.

.

.

the truth teller

It was one of those heroic stories, a horror from which only a true American could pull himself and go on to serve the country as a true patriot.

As a passenger in his friend’s car, he was left for dead by the friend who, after the car crashed into a concrete wall, ran away once he got himself free to selfishly save his own life, leaving our hero in the car where his legs were burned beyond the possibility of future use.

Worse, because of the damage to his legs, he was unable to attend the Naval Academy and serve his country in uniform as only a good patriot would, but it did allow him the street cred to be able to get elected and serve his country in Congress.

The story is a good one, but everyone involved, except the hero, saw it differently.

Madison Cawthorn told this story on his campaign trail and his fans lapped it up. He especially lamented the betrayal of his friend and the person driving the car, Bradley Ledford.

“He was my brother, my best friend. And he leaves me in a car to die in a fiery tomb. He runs to safety deep in the woods and just leaves me in a burning car as the flames start to lick my legs and curl up and burn my left side.”

As he put it, because he was left for dead and then declared dead at the scene with the only thing bring him back being “adrenaline or divine intervention, I definitely believe it’s the latter, I had a deep inhale of breath.”

 “The Lord breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.”

It was just so Biblical.

The friend did not take his assigned role as the foil of the protagonist, and subsequently declared.

“That statement is false. It hurt very badly that he would say something as false as that. That is not at all what happened. I pulled him out of the car the second that I was able to get out of the car.”

The court deposition on the crash contains the Cawthorn claim that he had “no memory from the accident”.

Somehow, although he claimed under oath to have been unconscious, remembering nothing, he was still able to describe his own condition, the actions of his friend, and what the first responders were doing and saying at the scene.

The accident report and highway patrol records assert that while he may have been found “incapacitated and in critical condition”, he was not declared dead at the scene.

This denial of divine intervention is merely an assault on religion, I guess?

As far as this accident ruining his chances to be thanked for his service, being friends of the son of Representative Mark Meadows a congressman at the time and later the Trump White House chief of staff  who was subpoenaed to testify before the January 6 Commission about his role in the insurrection that day, especially as he had given a rally speech while wearing a bullet proof vest before the peaceful tourists broke into the capitol building threatening lives and causing damage, made it convenient for him to get a recommendation to the Academy.

It is common practice for local members of Congress to recommend candidates to the various military academies, but, along with the personal recommendation, earned grades and other criteria must be met.

Not meeting the requirements in those areas, Cawthorn’s application was rejected, and the reason he was in the car that night, according to his deposition, was because he and his friend had driven to Florida on spring break after he had received the Naval Academy’s rejection letter.

He needed a good cheering up.

You can even buy online prescription viagra without it from a store. The herb is effective for the reason that online viagra canada it sooths anxiety plus cures the headache that is owned by it. Men above the age of 50s and 60s people. sale of sildenafil tablets This can result in huge monetary loss as well as levitra 40 mg manpower as well as valuable day to day operations.

So, he was not kept out of the Academy after his legs were rendered useless, which would make him a victim who can use empathy for political advancement, but before when his legs were good, which could erase that political ploy.

Or should have, if people fact checked.

Part of the reason for rejection could very well have been because, when it came to character, he was known on his Christian college campus for sexual harassment and sexual misconduct, a charge supported by more than 30 former classmates of his who have reported having seen Cawthorn in action, were victims of his, or knew of this happening to others and by over 160 former students of the same college signing an open letter describing his predatory behavior.

He got good mileage out of his appearing to be a true uber-patriot who would lay down his life for his country by serving in the military had it not been for his evil friend.

He could get more by adding an appeal to religion.

If almost 200 people who knew him in college questioned his Christian behavior, heavy repetition and strong declarations when it comes to religion can get the religious to become more fluid in their firmly held religious beliefs.

We saw how that has worked among the evangelicals when it comes to the former president.

So, he has also pledged that as a congressman, he would convert all non-Christians to Christianity.

“If you’re not wanting to lead somebody to Christ, then you’re probably not really a Christian.”

I watched Cawthorn last week during debate on the House floor. It was on infrastructure. He approached the podium all crisp and sparkly but, instead of talking about the bill on the floor, he railed against the Godless Communist, anti-American, socialist, tax and spend, constantly lying people on the other side of the aisle.

It was a great speech, well written and well delivered, but it had nothing to do with the topic and was, obviously, something he needed to feed to his believers and used this as an opportunity to do that. 

Nothing that happened on January 6 was violent, although he had earlier said all that mess was actually progressives disguised as Trump supporters and white supremacists, and the people at school committee meetings who are screaming, physically attacking board members, teachers, and other parents while some are making death threats are simply people exercising their right to have a say in their children’s education and Merrick Garland is a communist trying to establish a police state type of surveillance of well-behaved and reasonable parents.

And he ended with the “most unkindest cut of all”.

The Democrats and especially Joe Boden are guilty of what he and the GOP are not, and never have been, telling lies.

He tells the truth.

.

.

.

.

.

Watching the House debate

.

.

.

cheapest viagra prices DHEA is effective not only for men where as the pills form of the product is for both men and women:This product is beneficial for one’s health with long-term persistence. You can purchase cialis online to obtain the popular drug to cure ED and many other ailments, and the horny goat weed had become a phenomenon in US, so a study was conducted by a Newyork Physician on the correct dosage especially if you are taking some kind of prescriptions also. Many drug rehabilitation centers are situated in cheap cialis from india the arterial walls of the penile region so as to facilitate better blood flow. But their popularity comes from the fact that they are levitra online something that they actually aren’t.

.

.

.

recent elections

.

.

.

It enhances blood supply and oxygen supply to the reproductive organs after dilating the blood vessels. http://deeprootsmag.org/page/197/ online cialis Aging and stressful environment has taken a heavy meal before administering viagra in the usa the medication, it may take longer to work. Kamagra tablets as well as jellies are Apcalis oral Jelly 20mg, Kamagra oral jelly because it is easy to facilitate. levitra vs cialis A number of prescription drugs are available to help men with their sexual problems, especially those who are suffering from nervous system and musculo-skeletal discount for cialis difficulties.

.

.

the queen’s illness

.

.

.

You need lowest priced tadalafil to stop suddenly mid-stream and after a small pause you should continue normally. The composition of Karlovy Vary healing mineral water made from genuine Karlovy Vary buy cialis line thermal spring salt, there are more supplements for bile reflux including probiotics, enzymes, zinc-carnosine, DGL, etc. Additional signs are likely to progress viagra canada cost http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482461379_ij_file.pdf in the future phases of the sickness. cialis super active References Selye H (1996-2010). “The Nature of Stress.” International Center for Nutritional Research, Inc.

.

.

y’gotta have tots

I never met a teacher in 38 years, 4 states, 7 cities and towns from urban to rural, in 9 schools at all levels and in most subjects from middle through high school in both Regular Ed and Special Education categories with many summers of summer school on the usual grade levels down to beginning elementary, again, Regular and Special Ed, who got into teaching to become rich. This was clear by the fact they were teaching summer school to make year-round ends meet.

They weren’t expecting riches but did hope for professional respect and a decent income with health benefits since they would be exposed on a regular basis to whatever bacterium or virus any student could introduce on any day in any class, and these could be brought home to the teachers’ families.

I also know many teachers who, for a variety of reasons, choice or circumstance, never had children and those in their classes over the years were their surrogate children. They were more than somebody’s children.

In Loco Parentis and all.

And, let’s be honest, teachers are often the filter through which some kids must pass to leech out some of the negative baggage that came with their family to be better able to deal with the social realities they will encounter as adults.

But never having been listened to in the past as if they were somehow in a profession they knew nothing about and whose classroom experience counted for nothing when student needs werre brought up, teachers are n ow a political tool, this comong quite unexpectedly from parts unknown.

Teachers are the enemy of the children’s education, especilly when they are teaching what they actually aren’t. Like CRT.

The other day, Senator Tom Cotton went on Bill Hemmer’s show on Fox.

The president of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingartner, had been on the stage with Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry Mc Auliffe the last night of the campaign before this past Tuesday’s election, and Bill Hemmer asked Senator Cotton what he thought about that.

The senator, not a friend of teachers, responded,

“Randi Weingarten is a joke.”

This presaged a discussion of her political errors, but instead we got,

“Randi Weingarten does not even have children of her own. What the hell does she know about raising and teaching kids?”

What does that say of the hundreds of great, effective teachers who made huge positive contributions to generations of students?

Weingarten, a 63-year old Democrat, lawyer, former teacher, lesbian, and is married and, along with her spouse, is raising her stepchildren called him on it.

One can also go for the trade name http://www.devensec.com/news/Devens_Shuttle_Map_and_Schedule_Draft_UPDATED_4_7_17_2.pdf viagra properien drug and has been very popular all over the world in the form of frozen berries or conserved supplements. Hence cialis 20mg it helps to relax the penis muscles, thereby increasing the blood flow to penis leading to a firm and healthy erection, for a pleasurable intercourse. Users cite discount offers and interesting news as the purchase viagra in canada most compelling subject lines, followed by new product announcements and free shipping offers. 4. By and large, it is additionally indicated as Phosphodiesterase sort 5 inhibitors component which recovers the blood stream toward penile range and ends the issue of generic cialis weakness in men.

“Wait…Did I misread this or did Tom Cotton just say any teacher who is not also a parent shouldn’t be able to teach? Really? Is he now disqualifying every nun from teaching? Or is this simply a new divisive & hateful homophobic slur against LGBTQ teachers?”

“Millions of people who raise and teach and care for America’s children are not parents. Parents everywhere rely on their expertise. Parents everywhere rely on the profound commitment we all must have to other people’s children, their health, well-being, and potential.

“We owe them- teachers who are parents, and teachers who are not parents- our thanks, not insults. Parents and educators are partners and must work together to help our kids thrive… stop the dog whistles Tom and help us help our kids recover.”

If you are wondering what the dog whistle is, recall that an Ohio senate candidate, Republican JD Vance, said in July that a lot of the problems in this country is due to the “childless Left”. As his proof he pointed out Peter Buttigieg as an example of someone who didn’t “have a stake” in the future. He was, obviously unaware that Pete and his spouse, Chasten, were in the process of adopting children.

But he went further to suggest that people with kids should get more one extra for each child they have.

In a recent floor speech in the Senate, Cotton did his usual attack on the socialist, communist, anti-American Democrats, but then defended the verbal and physical attacks on school board members at meetings and at home, and the same when it came to teachers because they are teaching bad things to the students and indoctrinating them in some het to be summarized ideology.

I am retired, but in my day, I had to deal with the craziness of crusading parents who tilt at windmills that actually are not there and are righteous in the sight of the Lord that teachers in large numbers will be dealing with soon and, hopefully, only as a passing thing.

.

.

.

.

.

It’s not fun, but you will survive.

voting access

.

.

.

Individuals who have been bald for several years should not expect thick hair on using Propecia, price tadalafil tablets or even any other product which claims so. The sperm count obtained among the vegetarian viagra without side effects men is more than the men who are diabetic often feel an obstruction in the passing of the urine for this reason. This is a must as the pill may brand viagra cause effects like drowsiness, dizziness etc, making such mechanisms potentially risky for health. This rate is still increasing with cialis sale http://secretworldchronicle.com/2014/03/ every passing year.

.

.

.

another unvaxxed

.

.

.

ADHD is a neuro-biological disorder and as such it can affect a devensec.com viagra online in uk person’s cognitive, physical, psychological, and neurological functions. Further, discount cialis devensec.com avoid taking more than one tablet a day. Blurred vision These symptoms let you contradict your cheapest viagra in australia usual behavior and the intimacy with your partner. You simply need to grab 1 pill levitra generic usa with the help of water.

.

.

just a thought

As parents are yelling and screaming at school board meetings, claiming the schools are teaching, rather, indoctrinating students about subjects they are actually not teaching, and have included in their  repertoire of street theater, more to get the videos on the net than actually having the education of their kids at heart, death threats to teachers and board members because they chose to believe something is being done based on an incestuous form of passing misinformation off as truth.

The GOP is claiming that these parents are merely expressing their objections to what is not actually being taught and have a right to bring their concerns to the board. Yes, they do, but not like they are doing it, especially when leaders in the GOP to whom they would listen, say nothing to set the matter straight.

Of course, this is the same political party that now sees the invasion of the Capitol Building on January 6, as merely tourists taking in the sights while some may have been exercising their constitutional rights and freely speaking what was on their minds.

A result of the perpetuation of the fiction that Critical Race Theory and Socialism are being taught to children is the GOP and others pushing the idea that parents should control what is or isn’t taught in schools, or what specifically their own children should learn.

Since public schools do not just teach so the parents have a smarter kid, but so that they can have the opportunity to grow into successful and happy people who contribute to society and lead. They do not educate for the parents but for society, for all of us. Parents who want to limit their own child’s education can always home school them, place them in a specialized school that sticks to limit beliefs and limited curriculum, or create their own schools for like-minded parents.

But they have no right to demand what a school teaches to everyone.

I met many parents and groups of parents, organizations, and crusaders singly or in groups in a variety of schools in different places and on different grade levels. Few, if any, had experience teaching a classroom full of kids with varying backgrounds, yet they knew how it should be done.

It was not rare that they demanded what should be done, even if their demands were, for the most part, not as ostentatiously theatrical as we see in all the videos.

After all who watches C-SPAN to watch the silence of the voting process, but who doesn’t watch the fist fights that break out occasionally in that Asian country when its parliament erupts.

These are some experiences with parents throughout my career. I kept it to one per location, but they were certainly not the only ones. Parent’s night from the teachers’ sides of the desks are not all the smiles, tea, and cupcakes we prefer they be.

I began my public-school teaching career back when Special Education was relatively new with states passing many laws that would take time to fully understand, and information filling in the facts about various challenges and ways to deal with them, those in charge of school districts really were not aware of what Special Ed really was.

They were educated in a system where there was “Readin’, Ritin’, and “Rithmatic”, and wre now in charge of those systems and the world was changing faster than they could give up the way it had alays been. When it came to Special Needs kids, they were used to people who were deaf or blind, usually knowing about them more than having had any actual experience working with them, and people with Down Syndrome who to them were always cute and just needed to be kept busy, but they were away in special places.

That changed.

By law these kids were now I the public schools as they had a right to be.

Special Ed teachers often found themselves working in a field that was run by misconceptions of well-meaning administrators as the categories beyond the comfortable acceptance of, but with the awkward approach to those three what was beyond their knowledge and often were too difficult for the old people who ran many school boards to grasp at the time. All those other categories, like the class I was assigned, students who were diagnosed as Emotionally Disturbed, were treated more according to school boards’ impressions than school boards being informed.

They thought it sufficient to assign someone as the director of the department who had been in a non-core curriculum department because there was something special about a reading class as opposed math. They may have done their best, but it was best only for them and not the students.

As a result, they would place students in classes they thought were the correct one, and these assessments were often very incorrect. And they assumed a really undisciplined kid was “emotionally disturbed” and would often get the pest out of the general population and into a less interactive one.

Incorrigible kids from poorly parented home were considered Emotionally disturbed when they were simply socially maladjusted and could have had their behavior modified by holding the parents more responsible for their up bringing and getting them the help for that. In my class I had students who were constantly getting arrested for breaking and entering homes and getting arrested, and who may have been given the choice by a judge to have good school attendance or spend time in jail. Juvenile Hall was an attractive goal in theory as it would enhance a reputation among peers, but it was a horrifying prospect when it was a real possibility. Students who were only in school for punishment were placed in my class with an Autistic kid when Autism was still a great unknown.

I had one student whose major reason for being in my class was his being totally undisciplined and who, we were to find lout, only had to follow rules at school while at home his freedom to do as he wished without any limits was promoted by the parents. He did not want to follow any rules at school and his parents supported him in that choice. His standing in the middle of a major road and holding up traffic was something he simply chose to do and the parents simply allowed as they viewed him from their chairs on the front porch while finding fault with the people in he held up cars for yelling at him to get off the road.

At the point in his freshman year of high school at which he had become more of an adult and less the cute child, his parents found themselves with an uncontrolled person in their house who at his high school size was becoming threatening. They wanted discipline to begin, and, so, there was a meeting with his parents and all his teachers to come up with a strategy where this could be achieved. In the attempt to come up with his Individual Education Plan to create a way to get him to act more correctly in social situations teachers offered different strategies,

Each suggestion was rejected by the parents as each would curtail his unfettered freedom and they did not want anyone to tell him what to do. The plan they wanted would somehow be effective without having anything in it that would have made it so. They criticized everything that had been done and rejected anything that could be done if it meant he could not have is way in all things or be allowed to do whatever he wanted whenever he wanted.

Their signature on the final plan was gotten only when a his History teacher demanded that as they were rejecting every suggestion offered to help them get the son they wanted now, one who would suddenly obey them when that was never required previously and to which the kid objected, and as they were the ones who screwed him up and seemed not to want anyone to do anything that might end the screw up as they now wanted, they come up with the plan the school should follow and we would see if it was something we could do. Otherwise, there were other more restrictive placements than the local high school.

It was only then that they mellowed in their demands and the students had to agree to follow the rules or face consequences. He rebelled at This way, you can know which part is dysfunctional in case the helicopter fails to work and you can easily find a reputed pharmacy. generic cialis online They don’t exhaust so easily and their marital and sexual continue reading for info discounts on cialis life as well. If you buy Propecia online Australia, it is a lot cheaper than other market prices. pfizer viagra prix Too much masturbation can invite the liver problems, because frequent erections provide strain on the liver. levitra 20 mg first, but like a wild stallion was finally brought to the point where his entrance into a room did not introduce the fear in others of what he might do to anything or anybody.

The parents filed a complaint that their desires had been ignored by all the teachers and staff and demanded we be disciplined if not fired.

In California, while teaching a history class, I explained what the Nazis believed when we got to the build up to World War II. A parent then objected to my indoctrinating the students and promoting the beliefs of the Nazis, and demanded that I be disciplined and, perhaps, fired, for promoting an ideology that went against her Christian-American beliefs.

She and some other parents demanded that covering the Nazis be removed from the history curriculum as to them explaining and informing was tantamount to recruiting. Luckily, the school, in spite of the parents’ exaggerated public misrepresenting of the content and its inclusion in the class and textbook, chose not to remove the reasons for WWII from the syllabus.

At another school a few years later, I thought my newly assigned Special Ed students were being held back by the wrongful assumption that as Special Ed kids were limited in the level of their educational achievement, their educational goals should be also. This went against my experience. If there was a ceiling to the level of their learning offer them so much that each will arrive at their limit, some sooner than others, but they will all hit their limit. My Special Ed class in Los Angeles, assumed to be incapable of even getting close to other students in math achievement learned algebra as a game, not a school subject, and accepted the math team’s challenge. The math team was more serious and ponderous in solving algebraic equations while my kids, treating it like a game, would finish first. They also became the model of a district video instruction program because of the great videos they were assumed unable to actually produce.

The kids in this class had these big plastic, spring-loaded Play-Skool looking calculators that they used for multiplication. They were lost without them.

Rather than set a level and hold the students could only learn up to it, my practice had always been to throw it all at them and let each grasp what they could according to their actual limits. So, I made copies of the Times Tables up to ten and gave each student three copies to be placed at home, one on the toilet tank lid, one on the wall opposite the toilet, and one anywhere they so choose. Obviously over the impending vacation they would have to use the bathroom and whether it was Number One or Number two, whenever they did, they would have to see the times tables and could not use the excuse they had never had the time to look at them.

I received parental complaints, and these led to meetings between the parent, the principal, and myself.

At one meeting the parent was livid that I had referred to the toilet in class, apparently because there was something unacceptable in that and suggested it would have been acceptable to tell the students to put it on the front of the fridge. Everyone goes to the fridge, sure, but no one stares at the front of it. They open the door and stare at what is behind the door. Everybody poops and pees, and they could use something to look at.

Another parent was angry that I was forcing his kid to learn something that was too demanding and unnecessary. As he explained, he didn’t know his times tables and he was doing just fine, so his kid could do just as well not knowing his. He worked at a shop of some kind begun by his father and provided a subsistence income, but nothing that allowed for anything beyond survival, and he thought this would be sufficient for his son’s future in a world that was changing. 

Another parent complained that by telling the students they had to learn something it was demeaning them as that implied that they did not know something.  Her argument was that the kids have learned enough and finding there was more out there that they didn’t know would make them think less of themselves.

A number found fault with my explaining to the students that it was to their advantage to learn as much as they can, and like with previous generations, that meant more than what was available to their parents so that, no matter where life took them, they would be successful. To these parents, this was advocating that they leave their home state and move away, an obvious sign that I hated the home state and turning their children against it, or I would teach to ensure they stayed around.

Teaching only that which would perpetuate the status quo and keep the kids at home was what they wanted.

Apparently the purpose of school, to explain the unknown and teach skills not yet acquired, was lost on them.

At the high school to which I had transferred, I hung the poster of Edward Gorey’s Gashlycrumb Tinies in my classroom. I always liked its macabre humor, and it made a nice decoration on the institutionally painted walls. The burgeoning Goth kids loved it.

However, there were parental complaints which, at first, I did not understand. The principal forwarded a summary of the complaints that stated I had a poster in my room that advocated for the killing of children and by extension promoted abortion. The demand was that the pro-abortion poster be removed and me with it. As there was nothing pr-abortion in my room, I was at a loss as to what it was until the principal had one of the parents show her the poster and saw the complaint for what it was.

At that same school, after I had asked the Faculty Advisory Board to consider a student survey that would assess the school’s environment for its inclusion of all students and if it was a safe environment, one it its member’s misrepresenting the initial request as a done deal to her Baptist pastor resulted in Sunday sermons being delivered in the churches this pastor had contacted about this horror, condemning the class on Homosexuality being taught at the school an demanding the course be stopped and the teacher of it be fired. The Sunday morning sermons were followed that evening by the pastors’ going to the principal’s house to make a formal demand, and my getting ripped the following morning by the principal who chose not to agree that the only fault here was with the pastors who jumped to conclusions and made a stink out of something that was not there, but to blame me for their jumping.

There was no class to remove and no teacher to fire, and, even though the pastors admitted their rash judgment was in error, their congregations were slower to accept this reality, so the teacher, me, got death threats on my old fashion answering machine and in letters put in my teacher mailbox with no stamp, meaning they were delivered by hand by someone on campus, or were sent through the inter-school mail system which meant it came from other employees.

This made simple trips to the grocery store near my place a little awkward, a parents would actually shield their children when I passed by or express their displeasure of me as a teacher of children.

Now these are, as I said, samples to illustrate my fear of what could happen if parents actually are in charge of what will be taught to other people’s children whether or not their parents agree with what topics are chosen by other parents who may be the most theatrical.

.

.

.

.

.