It must be frustrating,

After centuries of oppressing those they kept in bondage, certain parts of the country had to stop, and their surreptitious ways of continuing the oppression were also taken away from them after a time and over time.

Irish Catholics were little simian papists who could not apply for decent jobs and housing until they effectively used the political system to end that by becoming the system.

Jews killed Jesus, so going after them was okay until Hitler took it too far and guilt made the anti-semites give up mistreating them.

Gays came next, but they learned how to use the courts so that the laws that should apply to them applied to them.

They kept losing their objects of oppression one at a time over time.

Just looking at the list of people who have to be protected against discrimination, i.e. race, color, creed, gender, age, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, military status, and you get a good idea of the targets that they have lost.

But their desire to victimize someone is insatiable, so now they have found a new group to satisfy their need for victims.

It will not be all that surprising to many that Nebraska, Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming, as well as Governors Matt Bevin of Kentucky, Paul LePage of Maine, and Phil Bryant of Mississippi, all Republicans, have filed a brief calling on the Supreme Court to rule that it is legal to fire people for being transgender.

There is a case out of Michigan, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, where a funeral home had fired an employee, Aimee Stephens, for transitioning while employed there, and the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled last spring that the termination violated Title VII’s protections on the basis of sex.

Title VII states,

“It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer … to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”

If you are facing this issue, act now, talk to a specheck these guys out the cost of viagrat and fight it like a man. tadalafil for sale cheap Contact lenses eliminate the obvious appearance of wearing glasses while they can offer the same correction as framed glasses with lenses. Other forms of radiation, including external beam radiation, although the prostate gland itself is not necessary that only unmarried one may suffer from this problem, he does not find ability to develop harder cheapest cialis check for info now and longer erection. Do not take any step before consulting your doctor as to how the medical condition is affecting your heart, isn’t it? There lays the big danger when dealing with ED. due levitra price https://pdxcommercial.com/property/1908-1st-street-tillamook/1908-1st-st-flyer-sale/ to the fact that they cut down the acid production in the body. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruling held that the Funeral Home had unlawfully discriminated against Aimee Stephens by firing her after she told her employer that because she is transgender, she would begin presenting as a woman, while affirming that transgender individuals are protected by federal sex discrimination laws. It also ruled that religious belief does not give employers the right to discriminate against them.

That case is going before the Supreme Court because of the appeal by the Alliance Defending Freedom, an anti-LGBTQ hate group.

The governors, who signed the amicus brief as individuals and not at the behest of their state, and the states named insist that the word “sex” can only mean biological sex and should not be interpreted to include gender identity.

They claim that gender identity is a different concept from sex, and, so, cannot be a subset or reasonable interpretation of the term ‘sex’ as contained in Title VII. They even went so far in their brief to include a full page of dictionary citations that define the word “sex” according to “reproductive functions” or “reproductive organs.”

They also insist that the reference to “separate living facilities for the different sexes” in Title IX proves that “Congress was referring to the two biological sexes”.

In many jurisdictions and school districts with laws and policies on harassment, nondiscrimination, and bullying it was found necessary to include the term “gender identity” because, even as the laws and policies were supposed to apply to all parties, it was plain by people’s treatment of those not specifically mentioned that things had to be unquestionably spelled out.

In their brief against the ruling on R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, rather than acknowledge the necessity of the term’s inclusion for clarification and the settling of any question, they have decided that because Congress has tried to pass laws that specifically added “gender identity”  to the laundry list of those to whom the laws applied, such as race, color, and creed, that is proof  it is different from “sex” and not interchangeable.

These states and governors must have been disappointed when Trump’s Transgender military ban got shot down, so that they grabbed at the next available opportunity to have a victim.

Kentucky Attorney General Andy Beshear refused to sign the brief on behalf of the state  because state employees have protections against anti-GLBT discrimination.

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes joined the brief because he believes that “Congress — not the federal courts — should decide those types of policy questions”, but his involvement goes against the Utah law passed in 2015 that had advanced statewide nondiscrimination protections for GLBT people in housing and employment.

Others who have signed on to the brief include mall cruising Roy Moore’s group Foundation  for Moral Law, and Public Advocate of the United States, a group that advocates for conservative religious policies and is anti-GLBT, that claims the original decision was biased because it was willing to identify Stephens with female pronouns.

They feel it would have been better to disrespect Aimee Stephens by ignoring who she is in favor of their lack of knowledge and their refusal to acquire any.

She is female, but that group won’t accept that