KEEP YOUR EYE ON HIM

Although it may have appeared a little odd at the time to most people, the aftermath of the 2020 elections that produced the convenience of claiming voting irregularities had made election results questionable does go a long way in explaining why the Sheriff of Bristol County, Massachusetts, who had pledged county Jail inmates to help build Trump’s wall and secretly reported his parish church for making information available to immigrants, which is a very Christain thing to do, demanded he and his deputiess be allowed to patrol voting places without a shred of evidence that local law enforcement entrusted with that job were not up to the task nor was there any evidence he could use to claim that.

He needed to be at the polls to cause what could be seen as questionable activities that could call the votes into question, or, and this would not be outside the realm of his possibilities, fabricate a problem claiming he had personally witnessed whatever it was he invented.

He used this tactic when defending himself after the May 1, 2020, riot at his ICE detention center where his claims as the truth teller that it was the inmates who had done wrong were proven to be woven excuses for his own incompetence and bigotry.

He was stopped. He his Supreme Leader leader down because of all the counties in state, Bristol should have been the perfect pawn.

In 2022 there is more at stake than his just catching the eye of Orange-Jesus. Thomas Hodgson is up for reelection and his loss could affect whatever promises he has made to those, the local less than trustworthy shadow people, who have been benefitting from his being the sheriff and the white nationalist groups he has aided from his position of sheriff.

Local law enforcement, regardless of opinions in other areas, have been consistently effective when it comes to securing polls, and to ignore this to justify additional actions, whether directly or through transparent surrogates, is suspect at best, especially as the person in a position to push the intrusion at the polls is a candidate himself.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.