If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Heard that a lot from conservatives over the years.

Even though the Congressional Budget Office has been doing a job good enough to be used by both the Republicans and Democrats, conservatives want to change things and put a Republican-leaning economist in charge of the non-partisan department.

The purpose of the CBO is to show how much a bill will or will not increase or decrease the deficit over a 10 year period.

The formula presently used has found that if taxes are cut, revenue falls.

The conservative formula, called “dynamic scoring”, assumes that lower tax rates would boost growth and income.

She was able to correct this condition through the use of supplements and has been diagnosed free of this cialis sale uk condition today. This drug has been found beneficial in bringing a sudden change in one’s 100mg tablets of viagra life circumstances. This indicates that ED can be a potential sign of an underlyingcardiovascular cialis 5 mg trouble. Men often find it more difficult than women to discuss sexual cialis 5 mg check out now health matters, which can result in them feeling lost and unsure of ways in which this substance has been used. Grover Norquist is one of the conservatives wanting the change.

Paul Ryan likes the idea.

That should help explain things.

So far, the CBO has been even handed in its analysis, even going so far as to report that a minimum wage increase could result in a loss of 500,000 job, which, obviously, did not favor the president or the Democrats.

So one would have to wonder why, if things are working as they are, the Republicans would change the guy in charge for an obviously partisan appointment, and change the way the CBO has been working.

They have effectively played the American as fools already.

Are they about to engage in some voodoo economics, relying on their ability to put their thumbs on the scale with no one noticing?