Constitution? What Constitution?

There are states that have passed laws, or are in the process of discussing passing laws that would ban Sharia Law from our courts, and there are politicians and religious leaders who lie about Sharia to get people to hate Muslims and support them either with votes or “love gifts” of suggested monetary amounts.

Our laws are based on the Constitution, after all, and no religious belief should supersede that.

At least as far a Sharia goes, apparently.

Amy Coney Barrett is conservative Catholic and an opponent of a woman’s right to choose who has written on the Catholic Church’s need to end Roe v Wade.

She has also written about the duty of judges to put their faith above the law.

Barrett believes that long-established legal precedents can be ignored if they conflict with religious beliefs because they are not founded on the Christian religion.
Promoting the Release of HGH brand cialis 20mg One common usage of Arginine is in HGH releasers such as Genf20 Plus, Sytropin, GHR1000, Genfx, Cloud Nine HGH, Provacyl and HGH Energizer because it helps promote the release of growth hormone or HGH. Foods known as vasodilators work by making tab viagra appalachianmagazine.com the muscles calm and the nerves broad in form. We all have listened free viagra online as the first approved medical treatment for ED in 1996. Women Health Care is the today important part in the healthcare industries, women can now regain their sex lives back by choosing from various vaginal tightening prescription for cialis purchase products.
The closest Barrett has come to being on the bench, rather than only being a law professor at the Catholic Notre Dame University, was when she served as a law clerk for justice Antonin Scalia and appellate Judge Laurence H. Silberman.

Even though she clearly and publicly believes that the Constitution is secondary to a judge’s religious beliefs, Trump has nominated Barrett to be an Appellate Court judge.

Trump is nominating a Christian extremists who believes judges have “a duty to put their faith above the law of the land”, and this is yet another step toward an oppressive theocracy in our secular country.

If her point of view is legitimatized by support from Trump, then Sharia law should also take precedence over the Constitution, and those states with laws against that are oppressing certain judges because of their firmly held religious beliefs and are violating their religious freedom.

The law is the great equalizer, but not if one religion is given power over it.

Leave a Reply