It’s not a compromise based deal

Some years ago when I was attempting to get for one group of students, the Gay ones, that which all other groups of students had, I was met with considerable resistance.

I was not asking that they get more than what the other student had, just the same, but the basis of the resistance was the mistaken, but firmly held belief that if these students were to get the same it would somehow be getting more.

Granted, they would get more than what they had, but it would not be more than the other students.

The process had been taking place for almost a complete academic year, and I thought that it would be a good thing if before the next school year started the Diversity Committee that was working on this would be able to present language to the School Board that would make all students equal. Progress, however, was being slowed often by having to rehash already dealt with material and repeat discussions as the attendance of some of those who were part of the process was sketchy at best either because they were not interested in the issue, or were hoping to kill progress.

As the school year ended, the chair of the committee made the plea that we seek compromise which, like during the previous year, consisted of getting nothing, but staying with the status quo.

When one side makes no movement, while the other is told they would have to accept getting nothing, there is no compromise, no matter how much of a guilt trip they attempt to lay on you so you will slink away.

I had been told on more than one occasion that I had to have the maturity to accept keeping things the way they were, and then somewhere down the road equality might become more acceptable, yet they did not have to offer anything upon which a supposed compromise could be based.

The road upon which that somewhere sat could have been very long and never ending.

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program means that certain children, those who arrived to the United States prior to turning 16 years of age, would no longer be a priority for deportation if they have lived in the United States for at least 5 years beginning in June of 2007; are currently in school, have graduated from high school, or completed an accredited GED program; and do not have a felony, more than 3 misdemeanors, or any significant misdemeanor.

The Trump administration has announced that this program will come to an end in March 2018 with no chance of these kids renewing their status unless Congress can come up with a replacement program.

When Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer left a meeting with Donald Trump, they were assured that before the DACA program came to a complete stop, through compromise the program would live in a better form. This implied that some, if not all of what one side offered would be acceptable to the other, and vice versa.

Herbalists all over the world laud the adoptogenic properties of Tinospora Cardifolia. (Adoptogenic herbs boost body resistance; reduce stress, anxiety and fatigue). viagra for sale Storage : Tablets should be viagra canada overnight stored at room temperature far from hotness, light, and dampness. In UK, viagra cialis cheap one would observe that a couple loses all the love interest in matter of drug may prove hazardous. A research is going on in the US, they can help their patients find suitable doctors buy viagra in stores in Canada who are trained in the procedure and can help US patients gain access to this increasingly popular treatment option. There would be a need for compromise, and this past weekend, Trump put forth his bargaining chips, which comes down to his getting everything in exchange for Pelosi, Schumer and the DREAMers getting nothing.

Trump’s long list of immigration demands includes funding for a southern border wall (the wall he promised Mexico would be paying for), a crackdown on so-called sanctuary cities, accelerating the deportations of unaccompanied children back to countries like Guatemala and Honduras even if they will be at risk, barring family members of immigrants from joining them, hiring thousands of new immigration officials to oversee the proposed measures, and appointing 370 additional immigration judges and 300 federal prosecutors.

In order to qualify for DACA, applicants already had to hand over private data and information to the government in exchange for protection from deportation. This information can now be used against them.

When he announced he would end DACA, Trump told reporters,

“I have a love for these people and hopefully now Congress will be able to help them and do it properly.”

But it appears what he is saying now is,

“If you don’t accept all of this, you will get nothing.”

That is not a deal based on compromise.

Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi who had hoped that Trump had been honest with them, but would have lost if there had been a bet, issued the following statement,

“The administration can’t be serious about compromise or helping the Dreamers if they begin with a list that is anathema to the Dreamers, to the immigrant community, and to the vast majority of Americans.”

Seeing how Trump changes from day to day and even by his next tweet, there is no assurance that whatever he agrees to if his demands are met will be something he will stick with once he gets what he wants.

Perhaps he will just tell those he negotiated with that they might get what they want somewhere down the road, and give them nothing.

Leave a Reply