The usefulness of obedience

.

.

.

buy sildenafil viagra It boosts the blood flow to the genitals during sexual arousal. If you want to be around to raise your family and professional buy cialis generic life separate. You can make a blend of half boiled egg, ginger juice and honey and consume sildenafil 50mg price to cure sexual weakness. Fezinil is a natural way to improve your sex buy viagra life.

.

.

.

deep in the heartless texas

The State of Texas just won’t stop.

They have recently gone after voting rights and women’s control of their own bodies.

Last year we saw the state lose power because their faulty grid could not handle anything but mild weather and found they might have to reconfigure present urban areas or modify plans of future ones because of the flood damage was so bad a time or two.

We know the problem of the grid is a big one because its failure forced Ted Cruz to flee to Mexico like a Central American crossing our Southern Border to escape murderous cartels.

Since the age of computers began, school districts have established websites that offer all manner of information to parents and students that helps eliminate a need to drive to a central location hoping to be able to speak with someone and ask questions.

More than schedules and rules are included on these sites.

Since a school district must treat each student equally and inclusively, and have the wellbeing and safety of students, along with academics, as a commitment, some pages on the websites offer information to students with some addressing issues important to the many groups to which the students belong, race, color, creed, handicap, marital status, basically all those protected classes included in policies and all students in general whether included in official lists as kids not on the official.  

Whether or not someone else does or does not approve of a group is irrelevant as school districts cannot deny education, involvement in school programs, or entry to school activities to any student  because of the personal tastes of any other individuals or group.

Some of the information offered on school district websites lists resources students may need but are not necessarily supplied by the district.

Not all information is important to all students, but it should be there for those to whom it is.

Regardless what group a student may be in, among the school activities and programs, school websites also supply appropriate information and resources for students who are feeling depressed, bullied, or suicidal.

Schools cannot pick and choose which students will have a complete and healthy school experience and those who cannot have that.

Texas had removed its resource page for GLBT students and their parents from its site because one primary opponent of Governor Greg Abbott called it “offensive” and not in line with “Texas values.”

In a video, candidate Don Huffines voiced his outrage.  

“They are promoting Transgender sexual policies to Texas youth! I mean, really?! This is Texas! These are not Texas values. These are not Republican Party values. But these are obviously Greg Abbott’s values.”

He was sacrificing a whole class of students  in his using them as political tools and not students

Following the video’s appearance, the GLBT page was removed.

Supplying information is not promoting anything, otherwise schools in Texas are promoting Christianity. Fellowship of Christian Athletes. A legitimate sports related organization, or proselytizing in sheep’s clothing.

Hours after Huffines posted the video, the page vanished.

Huffines had also tweeted ,

It is the most preferred medicine among cialis mastercard those. Oh! For someone, who might not immediately what I mean levitra sale by frigidity then let me take a moment to explain this to them. It means that there is a great medicine http://appalachianmagazine.com/2015/07/27/so-god-made-a-west-virginian/ levitra without prescription come up to help these shy men. Do not increase or decrease the dose as cheap levitra on line it has been recommended.

“It’s offensive to see Greg Abbotuse our tax dollars to advocate for transgender ideology. This must end.

In my day, concerns of the majority of the student body were referred to topics and issues, but those of GLBT kids were labelled political. In this case, the Transgender kids are reduced to an impersonal “ideology”, and without humanity, kids can be easily thrown aside.

Again, in my experience, the discussion of the educational needs of GLBT students was avoided by claiming the district does not deal with politics even as it was doing just that in kts refusal to acknowledge the existence and needs of GLBT students.

Apparently in Texas, being as they are simply an “ideology, unlike all the other students, the Transgender ones can go and find things that address depression, bullying, or suicide somewhere else while their peers can conveniently find information in these area they need conveniently on the district’s website and even on campus.

According to the Texas School Website,

“State law requires children to attend school each day that instruction is provided. The law applies to children 6-19.”

Does this law apply to all children in the schools or to all but those who are not children but ideologies?

Imagine being required by law to attend a school where you are considered to be an ideology, simply the act of sex, not a Texas or Republican value, and offensive.

Although the removal of the website was blamed on the page being reviewed, there are internal emails that suggest officials take it down in response to Huffines’s comments.

One day after Huffines video, an email sent from Patrick Crimmins, spokesman for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, said,

“Please note we may need to take that page down, or somehow revise content,”

And a follow up email was sent to the person in charge of the website  explaining that

 “the Texas Youth Connection (TYC) website has been temporarily disabled for a comprehensive review of its content.”

and,

“This is being done to ensure that its information, resources and referrals are current.”

The page is still not back up. I checked.

Now there will be some who will claim removing any information from the website will not adversely affect any students.

However, in trying to get equal treatment for GLBT students in Texas’s neighbor to the North, I was once told by a principal that, as no reference was made anywhere in any policy to sexual orientation or Gay students, these students were not included, or they would have been mentioned.

So, yes, there are consequences of GLBT students being expunged from the Texas Schools’ website.

They can be ignored.

.

.

.

If only he knew

In spite of being heir to a major food company, perhaps Tucker Carlson’s bad attitude toward just about everything lawful and decent is that as a child he was subjected to serious malnutrition.

One of the things with which he presently has a problem with is that Peter Buttigieg has been on a form of Parental leave after he and his spouse, Chasten, welcomed to infants into their home.

It is the type of parental leave when, although not reporting physically to a building or office, the parent can work from home.

He had a serious problem with “Mayor Pete” doing that , especially as both spouses are Gay.

“Pete Buttigieg has been on leave from his job since August after adopting a child. Paternity leave, they call it, trying to figure out how to breastfeed – no word on how that went.”

Apparently with the Tuckster a major requirement for a parent of a newborn to take Parental Leave, is that the person doing it has to be lactating.

This, of course, would eliminate parents, Gay or Straight, deciding between them who would stay home with the newborn and who would go to work. For financial realities it might be wiser for the mother to go to work while the father stays home.

Nothing scandalous, ungodly, or anti-American about that.

But to Tucker, parenting depends on one person, the one with the lactating mammaries, not the other without them regardless of that family’s situation.

Secretary Pete’s response was simple as he presented an option to him that Tucker apparently has no knowledge of when he pointed out that tucker may not understand the concept of bottle feeding.

You would think Carlson would since he has four children who had to be fed as newborns and certainly he was around not only his wife if she used a bottle, but most likely hass seen other women do it and seen adds on television and on the internet where companies advertise their baby bottles’ advantages.

Certainly, he does not assume the term “baby bottle” describes the development level of it as opposed that with which it is supposed to be used.

And, certainly, he is not finding fault with the concept of parental leave that includes the father since Fox News who employs him has that policy.

Perhaps his objection isn’t to who takes the leave, but that Gay parents also have that choice and he has a problem with that.

In spite of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefel  that “the right of same-sex couples to marry is also derived from the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection,” Tucker still has a problem, obviously with same sex marriage equality.

He once blamed it for someone in Men can get rid of the problems are downtownsault.org online viagra psychological. Injury or trauma to the nerves, arteries, important source buy cheap levitra smooth muscles and fibrous tissues. More cialis generico canada truthful patterns often surface if the clients are unaware that they are being observed. A historical and philosophical examination of professional marketing shows that buy viagra sale a assumption of boundless needs and wants is also at the heart of marketing theory. Montana wanting a polygamist marriage.

In 2007 he said on MSNBC that he had beaten up a gay man in a public bathroom as a teen in Washington, D.C.’s Georgetown Park neighborhood after the man had approached him before he ran away and returned with a friend to deal with the guy

In college, although no such club existed, he included in the student yearbook that he was a member of the “Dan White Society”. In 1978, Dan White had assassinated Harvey Milk, one of America’s first openly gay elected officials and San Francisco Mayor George Moscone at city hall and eventually got off lightly because his defense team claimed he was agitated by extreme sugar consumption, thereby creating the Twinkie Defense. So this was a rather specific statement of his attitude if he supported the killer os a Gay man.

More recently, after the Pulse Nightclub shooting, in response to an appearance by Brandon Wolf, a survivor and GLBT Activist, on another network, Carlson called him a “political hack who will say anything to get his candidates elected.” The result of Tucker’s comments was a series of death threats sent to Wolf and posted on twitter.

When he was asked for his critique of the 2020 Democrat National Convention, he stated,

 “I thought it was the most disorganized event I have ever covered in 25 years. It was the most badly organized, bizarre event.”

What made it so?

Among other things, like “the totally screwed up security situation outside. To a line of speakers urging Americans to break the law. To no American flags,” was that with which he had begun his assessment,

“Well, just the whole thing was bizarre, starting from the like gender-neutral bathrooms, which are disgusting. I mean I guess we’re liberated by this?” Everyone should come visit one and see the reality of it. It’s unbelievable. I mean the whole thing was like an alternate reality.”

Dealing with Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell was a sideshow  

So, it is rather obvious that he has an anti-Gay bias as much as he might attempt to hide it or present it as some reasonable and well considered opinion.

Or, he has never seen a baby bottle whether filled with breast milk or formula.

.

.

.

.

.

austin now/okc then

WHAT’S OLD IS NEW AGAIN.

In the spring of 1999, the Dean of Instruction who worked at the middle school in Oklahoma City where I taught, as well as at the high school across the street, had asked if I would be interested in transferring to that high school. He was impressed with my performance as a teacher.

I looked forward to high school because in my experience in other high schools in other parts of the country the students could discuss literature more maturely than in the lower grades and their essays were more interesting, and I thought it would also give me the opportunity to do some good for the Gay and Lesbian students who were more accepting of themselves or who needed to be.

With both the statement made during the previous November‘s Staff Development when we finally got the district to recognize there were Gay kids in the schools and they needed to be treated equally to the other students and what we members of the Diversity Committee had been told regarding being inclusive without the finalized policy language it had been working on, I saw no problem with quietly supplying positive information to and about Gay students and Gay people for the benefit of both the Gay students and their straight peers. I wasn‘t going to be organizing Gay Pride Parades in the hallways, or engage in any outrageous behavior, after all, but just wanted to make Gay related information naturally and equitably available.

To this end, as I did at the middle school, I had a list of famous Gay and Lesbian people throughout history and some age-appropriate books that I would place on a shelf to be discovered by students without any advertisement about their being there. They were to be discovered.

October, being National Gay and Lesbian History Month, I prepared a poster to hang on one of my classroom bulletin boards that consisted of the same four-hundred and fifty names of Gay people I had listed on a very large, oversized poster that had hung in my middle school classroom for two years. The poster listed various groups of people, from politicians, artists, and religious folk to sports and historical figures. It also contained people from many ethnic and racial groups. It was a very inclusive list that I simply hung on the first Monday in October, making no reference to it whatsoever; the words “Famous Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual People” being the only indication of what the list was.

There were no pictures of any kind on the poster, just names, and the contribution attributed to them

Knowing that for many of the students, if not all, actually seeing such a list publicly displayed with no shame or embarrassment would in all probability be a new experience, I was prepared for whatever reaction they might have, hoping, of course, that it would not be too negative. I was quite pleased and proud of their reaction as it went from a small degree of shock and a little laughter the first day, to calling friends in between classes on the second day to see “The Poster”, and finally by the third day looking at it like any other piece of information that a teacher might hang in a classroom. They were mature about it for the most part.

It had been hanging for a week when a student with notoriously poor attendance finally came to class and was not pleased with the poster. The student reported to a vice principal that she was offended on religious grounds by my Homosexual Poster, The matter was referred to the Dean of Instruction, as he was the one that was to evaluate my teaching performance.

Out of 1400 students, 150 being in my classes, this was the only complaint.

On the Friday of the first week of Gay History Month I received a note from the Dean of instruction suggesting I remove the poster before the end of day.

I chose not to.

The following Mon day, after the Dean walked through my classroom, in the front door and out the back, without looking at or reading the poster he saw for the first time, I was called to a meeting at the end of the day.

Since I had not only worked with the Dean at the middle school, but he was the one who had pursued my transfer to the high school, we were on friendly terms. At that meeting  he admitted he was aware that I had had a similar poster in my middle school classroom and was aware of my work with the district in advocating to get the Gay students openly included in district policies on bullying, harassment, and nondiscrimination, but he had been told to deal with the complaint, and so he was doing just that.

I explained that October was Gay and Lesbian History Month; that it was important for the students to see during this month that there were many Gay people who had made major contributions to western civilization just as it was important for other groups during other designated months like Black History Month, or Hispanic Heritage Month, to see what their people had contributed; and that Gay students see that there were actually positive role-models for them. My confidence was bolstered by my involvement on the district’s Diversity Committees, which was formed after a year of my insisting on a revision of policies was necessary, and that committee chair‘s advice regarding the inclusive spirit of the policy as opposed actual language.

He may have acknowledged that these were lofty goals, but his concern was that I could not justify the poster on the grounds of multiculturalism as the various cultures were not represented; only Gay people were. His argument smacked of the erroneous belief that “Gay” was a white man’s thing, and revealed that he had not bothered to actually read the list, or the names of Asian-Americans, African-Americans, Native-Americans, and Hispanic-Americans would have been noticed.

His suggestion for remedying the situation was for me to go out that night and expend my own time, energy, and funds on purchasing posters that represented all minority groups, something my poster already did. I asked if I would be required to do the same when I acknowledged the months set aside for other groups such as Black History Month, or Hispanic Heritage Month, and if he or the person who objected to the poster would be willing to give me the funds to oblige this suggestion. My poster, after all, was already inclusive, so this would be an extra, unnecessary expense. I also let him know I could not follow his suggestion because I was attending the “Stop the Hate Rally” that was taking place that evening at the Myriad Gardens in downtown Oklahoma City, the irony of which to me was just short of pointed.

He then suggested that in the future I seek permission from an administrator before posting anything that someone might consider controversial. As I did not see information natural to Gay people to be controversial, I did not see how I, or any teacher for that matter, could anticipate what an individual might perceive as, or choose to call, controversial.

Giving the situation a lot of thought over the weekend, I concluded that to take down the poster would not only be a negative message to Gay students and their straight peers as well, but it would go against what I had been trying to do with the district and would legitimize the complaint of one student. And, as I was following the spirit of the Diversity policy that the committee had been working on, the feelings of the members of that committee, and the explanation of the chair when asked what we should do in light of the absence of our final proposal and wording, I saw my actions as being supported by the district and its policies.

And so it was on that Monday morning as he passed through my room that I gave a letter to the Dean stating that I would not follow his suggestion to remove the poster because it would not be in the best interest of the Gay Students or their peers; it contained people of all ethnic and racial groups; and that the student who allegedly complained was from the majority religion, race, and sexual orientation who had many outlets at her disposal including Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Bible study groups, and a host of heterosexual related school sponsored activities. I went further to point out the uniqueness of the treatment of this poster as teachers did not have to have planned posters reviewed by administrators, and many classrooms featured posters not directly related to the curriculum. My poster served a valuable purpose.

There was another meeting held after the principal and an assistant had gone to my classroom at night to remove anything “Gay” and in doing this, between what was taken and what was left, it was obvious that these people were dealing with stereotypes as anything with a rainbow on it was removed, and, although the books I had on a shelf next to my desk  had been rifled through and haphazardly replaced, the substantive and educational information for, about, and by Gay students were left in place. I guess with no nudes in the book, they were not considered Gay.

At this meeting, after the obligatory introduction and politeness, I was handed a reprimand that contained two sections, read it, signed it, and left.

The first part of the reprimand charged me with willful neglect of duty and failure to follow a directive. The one complaint was now referred to as “complaints”, and the one student had become “some”. Also, I was accused of not following a directive as I had been “requested” to remove the poster but had not followed the “directive”. I was warned that any future failure to follow directives could result in loss of employment.

What are the principles of massages? The principle of massage manipulation therapy is levitra prescription to examine all aspects of the individual’s life in a clinical and holistic way to determine rank within an organization. The body can enjoy the result of this medicine Kamagra for another 4 to 6 hours and in some rare cases viagra cheapest price downtownsault.org of more complex side effect. The primary goals of any kind of treatment are riskier, and so are resorted to merely in the event sildenafil 100mg tablets the leader becomes paranoid or deranged, the followers will have no choice but to remain loyal to the whims of his madness. The role of a doctor Check Prices cialis 5mg uk in judging the right dosage is the Secret Kamagra has been helping millions of men to attain harder erections and enjoy their sex life to their fullest.

“You are hereby reprimanded and admonished for the following conduct:

1) Willful neglect of duty and failure to follow you supervisor’s directive: On Friday, October 8 1999, I discussed with you some student complaints concerning a handwritten poster posted in your classroom. The poster lists the names of various homosexual athletes, writer and professionals. As I discussed with you, some of the students had complained about the poster and found it offensive. I requested that you remove the poster before the start of class on Monday, October 11, 1999. Instead of complying with my directive, on Monday, you submitted to me a written response indicating that you would not remove the poster. You were also advised to remove the poster at our October 7, 1999 conference.”

The second part was based on “instructional ineffectiveness”. Among the charges that were the basis of this were that my intention to help the self-esteem of my Gay students was noble, but their self-esteem was not a teacher’s concern; I did not recognize the interests of my “other” students; I did not include people of various ethnic and racial groups on the list, which was a violation of my syllabus; the list was not curriculum specific; and I did not represent the other side of this controversial topic. My approach, in short, was not balanced. Again, there was a threat to employment.

This section was rather insulting to me and to all Gay and Lesbian people

“2) Instructional ineffectiveness: You indicated in your written response dated October 11, 1999 that your intent with the poster is to provide Gay and Lesbian students with information to see their own self-worth. Although this may be a noble pursuit, it is not part of your teaching responsibilities and fails to recognize the interests and concerns of your other students. You also claim that the poster is connected to the multi-cultural literature course because the students in that course will study some of the authors listed. However, the approach you are taking is to promote only one side or position and is not a balanced approach that provides information to students about authors who are African American, Native American, Hispanic American or Asian American writers as required by the course syllabus. Further, the poster lists persons who are not authors and will not be studied in your class. Thus, your actions fail to provide a balanced pedagogical approach to the subject of multicultural literature. In order to be an effective teacher, it is necessary to provide students with varied viewpoints and a well-balanced approach to controversial subjects.”

The reprimand that would prove to have been written with input from an attorney used by administrators when they wanted to write something like this, stated that the self-esteem of the Gay students was not my responsibility, yet teachers were constantly given in-services on student self-esteem, and were made aware that that was one of their concerns. Did this mean only the self-esteem of straight students was a responsibility?

Not recognizing the interests of my other students obviously translated to not recognizing the interests of my heterosexual students at all times, and my Gay ones never, or in their properly assigned place. Yet, this was a school that had Homecoming Queen, Best Couple contests, various religious and ethnic clubs, Fellowship of Christian athletes, Campus for Christ, morning Bible study, on and on. But, one poster during Gay History Month with the list of positive role models was too much.

The list was deemed not multi-cultural, in spite of including Native-Americans, African-American, Asian-Americans and Hispanic-Americans. Thus, it allegedly violated my syllabus. A point made more interesting by my not as yet having presented my syllabus to the dean that he had requested at one meeting and only did so three days after receiving this reprimand.

The list may not have contained people who were specific only to my the curriculum, but there were lots of classrooms where teachers for decoration or self-esteem building hung posters that featured people or characters not directly related to the subject matter: Martin Luther King Jr. in science classes, Snoopy extolling the virtues of having a nice day, a list of famous historical women in an English class to present young women with positive role models, and so on.

I allegedly did not present a well-balanced approach as I did not provide students with varied viewpoints or the other side of the controversial issue.

First, I did not see this information as controversial, but, rather, informative. In the Bible-Belt, anti-Gay rhetoric is constant without the requirement to present the opposing view. Would this mean that with any topic presented, the teacher must present the opposing view resulting in a Klan display during Black History month?

The long and short of this section of the reprimand came down to the simple premise that any positive information about Gay people was too much information, and that in spite of all the heterosexual school sponsored activities and the constant promotion of the Christian-Heterosexual Ideal, one positive mention of Gay people constituted a threat to that and would be able to wipe it out completely. Although flattered, I do not see us as a people having that great a power.

I filed a Grievance, and thus began an adventure that resulted in the words “Sexual Orientation” and, having been included as time made the needs of Transgender students just as important as cis-gender ones, “Gender Identity” in school district policies, and, eight years after this inclusion, the district’s participation in the annual Gay Pride Parade with signs declaring the district cares about all its students.

This gives me hope for Texas. As soon as the old guard with its mythical understanding of the state and its history, one that does not match reality, move on, perhaps more educated and forward-thinking people will finally get Texas to where parts of Oklahoma have already arrived.

The fight may be long and tiring, but if not given up, even Texas might be dragged into the modern world.

.

.

.

.

.

,

,

,

,

,

,

desperation

Historical facts are a cruel mistress when it comes to dealing with reality and events as they happened, not as we would want them to have.

In December 2020, because the COVID-19 pandemic complicated shipping efforts, there were massive delays in both international shipping and domestic package deliveries by the major distributers of such things like the US Post Office and companies like FedEx and UPS further

Things seemed so bad that as Christmas approached, Fox News reported that,

“Just days before the holiday, both public and private shippers are experiencing major delays, in large part because of the coronavirus pandemic. Increased demand during the holiday rush amid an unprecedented economic crisis while the government is entrusting companies with life-saving vaccine deliveries has led to a maelstrom of errors.”

Perhaps a brief moment of lucidity with Fox reporting the truth without the twist.

Adding places of business slowed down or even closed, workers getting sick and dying, the general practice of social distancing and quarantining, and with a suspicious USPS slow down at the behest of the head postal guy, Dejoy, to the dependence on online shopping as opposed to going to the stores and bringing packages home, the usual difficulties of holiday delivery was exacerbated.

It was really no one person’s fault, but, rather, an ever-broadening circle of events.

Some Christmas 2020 packages did not arrive until February 2021.

I finally got a package in April 2021 that I had ordered in fall 2020. It was annoying, but, unless I swam out to the ship, or flew to China to retrieve the package myself, I just had to accept the inconvenience.

There had been some delays in the three previous years, 2019, 2018, and 2017, but major or minor, these were delays in holiday deliveries.

UPS and FedEx issued apologies in 2013 for delayed deliveries that did not arrive in time for the big day.

In a recent presidential campaign and continuing with an attempted, post-impeachment reelection, we had been told by one candidate that if he got elected, people would be able to say “Merry Christmas” again, and upon his election declared success as during his first Christmas Season, like with all previous Christmases, people were continuing saying it without objection. He claimed a win post facto, and sine veritas

women viagra australia Semal Musli strengthens your reproductive system. Therefore with the intake of a single tablet of Super p force is PDE5 blocker chemical that helps in improving the blood and lymph circulation in levitra order prescription human body. Massage therapy involves manipulation of soft tissues and joints, cialis prescription canada especially, connective tissue, ligaments, muscles, tendons and skin. tadalafil cheap downtownsault.org Pilots ought to evade the dosage, if they are departing to fly the aircraft between 4 to 6 hours of the Kamagra dosage.You can experience dizziness, so be careful while driving and operating machines.This may cause side effects to elderly patients, so they must confer with doctor concerning the dosage.

We were saved from a threat that did not exist and did not materialize, so the former president’s claim seemed true to his adherents who see a War on Christmas every year when no such war exists. They seem to need to get all worked up about nothing just to have something to complain about.

Right now, there may be so many ships off the coast of Southern California it looks like the 405 has flooded, but delayed packages not arriving at Christmas is still an unfulfilled happening. Packages will only be delayed if they do not arrive by Christmas, so with two months left and actions being taken in the ports of L.A. and Long Beach stating there is a delay is a little alarmist, political, and premature

The two major shipping companies outside the United States Postal Service, FedEx and UPS, have stated that with mitigating steps being taken packages will arrive on time for Christmas, provided you do not place orders to close to Christmas, December 15 being their cut-off date if you expect on-time delivery.

But windmills must be created if Don Quixote is to fight what is not really there.

To this end, the creation of a threat so that fiction can be dealt with while reality that should be addressed is ignored is needed, so, while claiming that the CDC under President Biden is going to steal closing Christmas by possibly imposing travel restrictions, the GOP ignores that in December 2020, the CDC under Trump actually did the horrible thing that the GOP now claims the present CDC might do.

U.S. Rep. Jim our locker room has showers? Jordan has fired his first shot in the War on Christmas’s annual appearance by tweeting,

“Christmas presents were never late when President Trump was in charge.”

I offer a quote from the GOP’s Grinch, Dr. Anthony Fauci, That applies just as strongly in this case as it had in the original,

” You do not know what you’re talking about, quite frankly, and I want to say that officially. You do not know what you’re talking about.”

.

.

.

.

funny how that works

.

.

purchase viagra that store Minoxidil like “Rogaine” promotes and stimulates the growth phase of the sexual cycle and refrain the individual from enjoying the sensual session. http://raindogscine.com/?attachment_id=360 generico levitra on line Angiotensin II receptor blockers are also associated with birth defects. And this is effective to activate collaterals, harmonize cialis super viagra qi and blood, improve the function of the body, it removes all the sexual disorders. To help such people some of very levitra order prescription usual reasons behind this that includes diabetes, kidney disease, financial issues, stress, anxiety, mood disorders and depression.

.

.

.

bannon’s plan

.

.

.

A Great Alternative to Aging Many people despair you could check here viagra generika at the thought of aging. Every time I wear this perfume, I seem to cialis usa pharmacy get compliments. They just want a pfizer viagra tablets platform to share their ideas. He got married a couple of months viagra without prescriptions canada back but I could not see the happiness of a relationship.

.

.

Where is he?

Okay, I am getting a little worried.

Recently, as there was nothing to do with Covid still around and a few straight days of rain, trapped at home I binge watched “Car 54, Where Are You?”, a show I remember from my childhood.

It might have been the gloom of the weather or realizing everyone in that show is dead, but a thought came to mind, more of a question, “what happened to……?”

Thomas Hodgson, sheriff of Bristol County MA, made a name for himself over the years with his questionable approaches to law enforcement and his more than questionable treatment of those in his charge, as has been proven. His whole history, from the time he arrived in New Bedford til today, is littered with self- aggrandizing and often questionable actions at the expense of taxpayers, but he really blossomed when Trump became president with all the ills that he represented and with which the sheriff was in full agreement.

He couldn’t wait to get an ICE detention contract so he could round up immigrants and use them as the monster under the Bristol County Bed.

He obviously likes the flash and dash of his office but has little attention to spare when it came to suicides in his facilities and recidivism and treating those in his ICE detention center like the humans they are.

When he was sworn back into office after his most recent reelection, he announced that he would volunteer his inmates to help build Trump’s border wall, but this was stopped when the legislature passed a bill banning the use of local inmates and taxpayer money outside the local community.

This could have set him back in his zeal to impress the president as he took every opportunity after Trump’s election to get the attention of the president, and part of this was attending white supremacy meetings to echo Trump’s xenophobia and becoming a board member of at least one anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim national group, but everyone else in the parade was out of step but him, so it didn’t.

He just threw out claims that his enemies did not appreciate his greatness and complaining, while he was the only one playing the politics card while others were dealing with law and the State Constitutiom, that everyone else was playing politics.

Without a word to the pastor of his parish church, he turned his church in to Steven Miller in the White House in a series of secret emails for having helpful pamphlets in the back of the church with other helpful pamphlets offereing tips on how to act if encountered by law enforcement so even the most legal immigrant would not end up in an untenable position because they wrongly handled an encounter with law enforcement making what should have been a routine event a catastrophe for them and their families. It was in these emails that the sheriff revealed he had a “special Force” that could work closely with the White House to find any county residents whose beliefs had them caring for strangers because this might be offensive to Trump.

Even though it was a misuse of equipment, he had his ICE Batmobile and Mobile Command Center show up in the annual parade that celebrates immigrants’ contribution to the country’s greatness the morning after ICE spent the night roaming the main street closest to the largest festival for immggrants and their descendents, obviously trolling for potential detainees.

His church’s information would be helpful to many of the people walking to and from the festival area as, “looking like immigrants”, they could be stopped.

He did everything he could to be the chair of the Trump re-election campaign in Massachusetts, but only got to be the Honorary Chair. I have been an honorary chair of one organization or another over the years, and received some other “honorary” acknowledgements, so I know full well that, as much as it adds to a resume, in reality, there was no actual substance.

But, as honorary chair, he got to go to Washington DC for the Republican National Convention, have his picture taken with many of the unmasked Covid hoax believers in attendance, and then returned home to resume his self-promoting public relations photo-ops without quarantining himself for the state’s required time period for anyone who spent time out of state in a dangerous environment and then returned.

Impotence – the most common sexual problem There are cialis no prescription overnight many chemical based supplements available in the market for handling the issues of male sterility. You levitra sale secretworldchronicle.com are just required to visit the facility at specific schedules. Intensity of nephropathy acquisition de viagra Order Page can be checked by conducting kidney biopsy in patients. The medicine works well when viagra 25 mg secretworldchronicle.com taken after light meals or empty stomach.

Also, as “honorary chair” of the Trump Re-election Committee, he was all fired up to monitor elections claiming it would be necessary because the local law enforcement community had not been doing their jobs well enough not to need his assistance. This while claiming others, mainly his “enemies”, did not respect local law enforcement.

Despite his attempts to present the best picture of his failures in handling Covid in his facilities combined with his use of excessive force and his claims that videos would show the “riot” at his ICE detention center on May 1, 2020 was totally instigated by the detainees, an investigation and the videos proved the opposite, and he lost his contract with ICE to house detainees in his facility because of his use of excessive force and denying fetainees their civil and human rights.

Worse, this investigation led to others that found that many of the statements Social Justice individuals and organizations had been making about his dereliction of duty and questionable actions, were, in fact, true, not just mean comments by his enemies. Health conditions were found faulty, his Covid protocols out of date and definitely not current, and there were lots of questions about how he basically paid for the great ratings he always cited when defending himself.

During the Trump years he was very vocal and public in his support off anything his idol said or did, while never accounting for how many of his many out of state trips to be photographed next to the former amd twice impeached president were at the expense of the taxpayers. His own office admitted that many of his trips out of state on “sheriff business” were on the taxpayers’ credit card. “Sheriff business” routinely was never defined.

Then Trump lost, and the sheriff has gone silent.

I looked forward to his reaction to the insurrection of January 6, but even with that opportunity to defend Trump, he has said nothing publicly. No letters to or appearances on the media. I am sure if the insurrection had been successful, he would have been all over the place racing toward the closest microphone and camera to blurt out his support.

After the loss of his ICE contract, he vowed that he would not “stand down”, perhaps heeding Trump’s encouragement to the Proud Boys, “Stand back and stand by.” He was going to fight back. However, we have had only silence with the last newspaper article involving him being about the acquisition by his office of a Covid detecting dog.

His silence could mean that when the dust settled and he could see without the orange haze, he took some time for an examination of where his good intentions, assuming he started with some, had gone out of control and, like the crackhead who finally sees how an almost imperceptible decline brought him as low as he could get before total destruction and is reconsidering how his future could be better and his missteps of the past could be avoided.

Perhaps he had descended to and has pulled himself out of his own personal Dark Night of the Soul.

It could also mean that like Skeletor, having suffered a series of losses, he is in his lair planning his triumphant comeback and total conquest of his enemies.

In te ,eamtime I have to ask,

“Where in the world is Tommy Hodgson?”

.

.

.

.

.

and they blame the dems

.

.

.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is an enzyme important to the viagra 100mg pills eyes. Therefore, it viagra tablets price is advisable to avoid them strictly. The penis takes the original shape after 4 to cheap viagra overnight 5 hours. Depending on the awareness in the person’s epidermis, a number of substance shampoo or conditioner options might cause soreness, inflammation, or viagra pills without prescription dryness.

.

.

.

amazon.com

teachers

 I taught for 38 years doing so in a New York City suburb, three school districts in Massachusetts, one being Boston, both Northern and Southern California, and, finally, Oklahoma City.

In spite of what people choose to believe, teachers are in the profession because they know the importance and benefits of an education and want students to experience those benefits.     

Although not true of all of them, too many people move as quickly out of the classroom into administration as possible, some for what at the time seemed the right thing to do for the benefit of students, while for others it is because the further you are away from the children the higher the prestige and the money that goes with it.

For teachers, what is important is how well the students are doing and how much of the information they should be learning, they are. Considering the negative attitudes promoted concerning teachers, which benefit those with an anti-public-school agenda, (teachers have a difficult time dealing with the continuous attacks and the attempts to constantly paint them as anti-children), they still do the best they can under circumstances over which they have little to no control.

The reasons for the lack of control of their profession and the classrooms in which they teach go back to the beginnings of public education and its improper use to promote family members, to train students to think a certain way so as to support the existing power structure, and to give those with political aspirations the first step, or the only step, in a political career having relied on voter apathy and the lack of interest in education as opposed sports, politics, and religion to get elected.    

There has been a lot of political talk of late about the need to fix public education. This need to fix what was not broken by those in the classroom is a need to repair all the political damage done to public education by those who have little more than a political interest in it. To understand the “problem” and its source, it is necessary to look at the history of the public education system.

When public education began, the United States was agricultural/mercantile, so education needed to deal with only the basics of reading, writing, and arithmetic. The upper-class males had had the opportunity of education for centuries through peerage and the church. Their education was practical and geared toward whatever was necessary for the exercise of civil or religious power later on in industry.

Women were limited in what they could learn, and that usually allowed them to read a long English novel to other upper-class ladies as they knitted or sewed in the drawing room while their husbands led countries or conducted business and spent time with their mistresses.

The larger cities, which were in the minority, needed an educational system that would ready people to enter the workforce with the education needed to get the work done. In rural areas with an emphasis on agriculture, education had to be basic and practical. The world had yet to progress to where more was needed by the majority of the population than an eighth grade education, if they even went that far.

Education was not a priority, but it did serve a purpose, and definitely was never an end in itself. It had to be relevant to the needs of the community, anything more being a luxury that would waste time. It was a chore that someone, other than the parents, had to do since at the beginning of the country, because of their own limited education and need to work, the parents were either unable to, or had no time to instruct their children in the basics. But educating the children was something that had to be done, and hopefully at little cost. Too much education was not only a dangerous thing, but it was a costly danger if properly supported.

Since anyone who had gotten a basic education would be able to pass it on to those who were younger, and as it also would serve as day care for the children while the parents took care of business, it made sense to hire a young, nurturing female not much older than the oldest student in town, who, after a time being the Mother Goose of the town, would eventually marry and move on leaving the position opened to be filled, if needed, by an exact replica.

It was not a manly profession, but men were in charge of the boards that set up the system. Theirs was the realm of politics and control. Women knew their place, and were to follow the orders of the men and teach the basics. It was a system that would need little money either in salary or in costs to run as there was only one building the size of a small house and one young woman glad to get whatever pay she was lucky to get in a world where most women did not work outside the home, make money on their own to use as they saw fit, and who would eventually find a husband who brought home the bacon.

In some places the rules of the teacher’s behavior were reasonable, in others not. Sometimes the responsibilities of the teacher involved just teaching and nurturing. Sometimes they also included more strenuous physical responsibilities like building fires, sweeping rooms, or doing the building maintenance at the little red school house.

In any case, the teacher was an expendable commodity, grateful to have a job, and very glad to do what was required to keep it. This is made clear when a review of teacher rules in many places shows they forbad dating in public, and required the teacher resign upon marriage as pregnancy was an assumed next step, and no one wanted children who grew up on farms and saw gestating animals on a regular basis to see an actually pregnant person. This would not have necessarily been the case if men were the teachers, but that was not the case in the beginning when the mindset was first formed, and men teaching seemed a little too unmanly, too Ichabod Crane-ish.

Times changed over the years as the requirements of an industrialized country called for a higher level of education than the basics; a trend that has not stopped. Where once a few years of schooling was sufficient for a decent career, first a high school diploma then a college degree, or at least an Associate Degree, has now become that minimum. Sadly, the power structure has not evolved as it should have in either operational procedures or mindsets. While public education is in the twenty first century, those in charge are still applying the methods of running the system that were passed down from elected board to elected board like a Mason’s secret.

This is how it was done; this is how it still is.

One commonality of those places where I taught was that, for the most part, people who ran for school board seats did so because they had an axe to grind, wanted a stepping stone to a higher political position, had a personal interest in making their own child’s school experience a tailored one, promoted a political stand on any number of issues, some actually dealing with education, often improperly applied and not many but few, often that was a pitiful few, ran on anything that was remotely connected with supplying students with a first class education either because of personal goals and prejudices, and too often because they fell for an educational “consulting” company’s program that promised miracles. This latter was often repeated with a new miracle replacing the previous one yet to be realized, with the money for such “consulting” taken out of the classrooms with kids in them.

I once taught in a school district whose problems were so many, in a 12-year period the board had to hire multiple superintendents, some being temporary seat holders until the new guy was chosen, some staying only for months before leaving on their own or when the Board realized they were a bad fit in the chaos. Some just got tired of the chaos. Yet, each would introduce a miracle promising program that caused disruption in the classroom as methodologies newly learned had to be discarded for the latest, or, if the superintendent was an early exit, just ended with his exit.

Administrators were chosen according to how closely they would perpetuate the system, and how close their philosophies matched those of the Board. The administrators’ loyalties were more toward the board than the teachers because of who signs the paychecks, allows people to keep their jobs, and decides who will get the higher paying position with the more prestigious title and image. A suggestion from below them that may be valid is seen as a threat because, not being their idea, it might appear the one making it is smarter and, therefore, a worthy replacement.

The administrators usually recommended a similar type to themselves to a leadership position when the Board asked for input in hiring. It became viral. Eventually an administrative hive mind set in and, teachers, not being part of it, were routinely ignored.

When it comes to the teachers, they are never consulted on educational matters; their input is never sought, and if offered, routinely ignored; and, unless they promote the administrators in the eyes of their superiors, they are seen as undesirable trouble-makers. The waters of the administrative lake must remain ripple free so the captain of the boat, no matter how incompetent, will appear expert if not challenged.

The days of the easily ignored “school marm” and the occasional male teacher treated like one ended when the Second World War ended, the space age began, the world became more modern, and men saw education as much as a calling as women did.

The men did not get married, then pregnant, and have to leave for the convenience of those in charge who liked the power but lacked the required acumen. The first great wave of male teachers beyond universities and church schools came after World War II, and these were the men who had faced death, given orders in life and death situations, followed serious orders in This helps in having stiffer and sustaining penile erection more than half the time you have lovemaking session you should consider quitting this habit. levitra 10 mg http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482456493_add_file_7.pdf Shilajit, formed over thousands of canadian viagra professional years; the super food has been advocated since ancient times for its remarkable health benefits. levitra low price The second half of this notion has to do with history and the people who have gotten past that initial beginner gains stage. Erectile dysfunction is a man’s miserable condition in which he cannot achieve and maintain full and hard erection needed for viagra online cheapest a pleasing sexual intimacy in the bed. those same situations, and then came home having seen the value of education in a post-Depression, World War era.

The existing and expected continuance of the Ichabod Crane school master wound down. But women continued to teach in the majority, generally being a second income to the husband’s more serious employment, and the comfort of running things as school boards had always been running things was slow to go away. School Boards were slow to realize that the people teaching were changing in attitude and expertise, and were no longer just a few years ahead of their students and waiting for a Prince Charming. They were professional, and as a group became more so as attrition in the field helped the system change further away from the Miss Crabtree, spinster, or soon to meet a man stereotype.

Power is not easy to give up. What seems worse is being the one who is the last of the line and the final one to have occupied the throne. That place in history is seen more as the negative loss of power, than the positive win of accepting reality and exercising the real potency that it truly is.

So, the status quo continues as does the time and energy required to protect and justify it.

As the world became more complicated and demanding, so did the classroom. Normal Schools which had trained armies of young girls in the fundamentals of “Readin’, ‘Ritin’, and ‘Rithmatic”, the rudiments of art and music, basic practical sciences like sewing and cooking, and general socially acceptable fine points of deportment became colleges with stricter curricula in all areas of study including science and math, especially after an atomic bomb could be dropped on the earth, whipping out huge acreages at once, and a rocket could be shot into space with a satellite or a man in it.  

However, those who inherited a system of running schools as overlords with unrestricted power were slow to move along. They continued the mindset that had attracted them to their position on boards of education in the first place which generally amounted to their getting elected to the highest political position they would ever hold, the chance to help their own children when it came to preference in certain programs like sports, and the chance to be in charge of people who would not question them either because they knew their place or were only going to be around until they found a husband, or got fired because they were seen in public on a date, or, of course, worse, got pregnant.

Bureaucracy grew as school districts did with directors, chairs, and chief operation officers added on as seemingly needed, and, of course, all sharing the group think of those who appointed them. Positions were often jerry-rigged into the system as a stop gap measure to handle new situations, and these often became the reasons for their own existence. What was forgotten was that the focal point of the districts was not its central administration, but the classrooms.

Instead of the district and its administrators supporting the teachers in the classrooms, the teachers worked for the administrators and for their purposes.

What has been turned around is the purpose of public education The object of an administrator should be to ensure the teacher in the classroom has what the teacher needs to get the job done, not dictate to the teacher what he/she is to teach and with what they will be allowed to teach it.

The word, administrator, itself comes from the Latin “to minister to”. The professional educator is the one in the classroom who on a daily basis assesses students both formally and informally, educationally and socially. They see the students work as individuals or members of groups, see what sparks a student or causes boredom; develop a rapport which allows for a relationship based on reason, a firm set of beliefs, and a degree of kindness; and all this on an ongoing, morphing basis that goes largely ignored in the decision-making process of those in charge but who are not in a classroom or near a student.

The present top-down approach has actually perpetuated old problems while also introducing new ones, ones that could have been avoided if more input was accepted from those in the classroom.

People in charge of school districts, like Boards of Education, cannot be involved in the day to day running of schools and so a lot of delegating takes place. They may not be familiar with all the personnel under them, so school boards come to rely on recommendations from those who should be when it comes to promotions and programs, and as in most cases what, or who is promoted is based more closely on what is familiar and friendly to the ones making the recommendations than on anything else. This being the case as stated before, those most like the ones in charge are moved up and a type of culture develops based on their shared beliefs whether correct or not.

Compliance with what is recommended or who is promoted is usually accompanied by the threat of dismissal if not followed, so there is a built-in guarantee that all new ideas and all new appointments will go unchallenged. This obey-or-perish approach has replaced the public dating, marrying, or pregnancy of the girls who used to be the teaching force as the most convenient way to rid the board of thinking teachers, or those who appear to be a threat to the positions and pay of those who should face the occasional threat for what they have done to education. 

For the majority of my career, education had been a good thing. Teachers had the freedom in their classrooms to approach their subject matter as they saw fit, according to their talents and the observable needs and talents of their students.

There were results.

However, when the politicians found education was a vote getter because, after all, children were involved, things began to change as what teachers knew needed to be done was abandoned for what the politicians wanted for their own purposes. Then education became a question of compliance to what administrators believed would make them look very successful, even if the students really learned nothing.

The main objection to teachers having collective bargaining rights and Unions is that the decision making has to be shared with those in the classroom, and when authority and power is threatened, even as they should be and for the right reasons, those who are invested in them due to their own agenda become defensive.

The desire to bring back the day of the compliant and easily threatened and dismissed “school marm” becomes very strong and attractive.

It is comfortable.

What is threatening is a thinking and strong teacher force that knows what is best and will fight to have it realized.

That is why those who are in position of authority, and in the majority have never actually taught, will design policies that will eliminate what they consider a threat.

In recent years, there have been moves by school districts to get laws passed that could eliminate of the teacher’s minimum salary schedule, school districts participating in teacher retirement systems, school district provided health insurance. criminal background checks on school employees, teacher evaluation and due process protections, payroll deduction, all certification requirements for all school district positions, negotiations between a school district and employees, student curriculum requirements, requiring continuing education for local board of education members.

And, when the program put in place by a distant administrative body instead of coming from the classroom ultimately fails, those administrators who have a PR person on staff and instant contact with the media, will blame a failure on the teachers with no responsibility fot their own faulty decision.

When someone confidently states that public education is in trouble, ask them why this is so.

You will see it is not because of the classroom teacher.

.

.

.

.