“Since the founding of our nation, many of our greatest strides, from gaining our independence to abolition of civil rights, to extending the vote for women, have been led by people of faith and started in prayer,” the president said on Thursday. “When we open our hearts to faith we fill our hearts with love.”

Donald J. Trump, 2019 National Prayer Breakfast

The assumption is that his claim during his talk at the Prayer Breakfast that people of faith had abolished civil rights was simply another Trumpian gaffe, but this was not a gaffe, but a statement of fact.

For many religious conservatives, freedom means the right to act on their opposition to same-sex marriage and other practices that go against their beliefs.

On May, 2017, Trump signed the executive order, “Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty,” and the following year President Trump signed an executive order revamping the White House office on faith issues that will consult with faith leaders on ways that the federal government has failed “to comply with protections of federal law for religious liberty”, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued guidelines on it in his subsequent guidance directive, “Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty.”

It is clear from these documents and Trump administration’s actions and utterances when it comes to Muslims that religious liberty only applies to conservative Christians who now have been given license to discriminate against GLBT people, women, religious minorities, and nonreligious people.

When it comes to questions related to religion, Trump relies on advice from Christian nationalists like Jerry Falwell, Jr., Paula White, Robert Jeffress and Franklin Graham, and according to a report “Make America Christian Again,” Christian nationalism was the single most indicator of support for candidate Donald Trump in the 2016.

According to the Sessions guidelines,

 “Except in the narrowest circumstances, no one should be forced to choose between living out his or her faith and complying with the law. Therefore, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, religious observance and practice should be reasonably accommodated in all government activity, including employment, contracting, and programming.”

The Alliance Defense Fund, a legal advocacy and organizing coalition for Christian nationalists, believes not only that America was founded as a Christian nation, but also that religious conservatives must save America from moral decline, and they are the ones whom Sessions consulted when coming up with his DOJ guidelines for interpreting federal religious liberty protections.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development allocates $2.4 billion of non-sectarian tax dollars annually in the form of homelessness assistance grants, but, based on someone’s claimed religious beliefs, GLBT homeless youth could be turned away from faith-based shelters that receive HUD funds.

Besides the medicines, plentiful physical exercise, yoga, meditative practices, healthy eating, habit of being social, getting proper sleep, reading motivational thoughts, discussing the problem to someone very close, asking for buy cheap viagra Facts about buy cheap viagra the help from the psychotherapist, being regular on workout plan and getting busy in the day schedule. So, Micheal was really touched by this viagra cheap sale that she was caring for so much. Overdose : If wholesale cialis you think you have used too much of this medicine seek emergency medical attention right away. Through studies, an estimated discount viagra 10 to 20 million of American men age 40 to 70 tend to suffer more regularly than males in their prime. medical intercession is the figure one option of many even health professionals when it comes to multi-organ transplant, considering a patient of life support system is the best choice. Tax-exempt entities can deny citizens access to what is supported by those who pay taxes.

The guidelines also direct that the DOJ should not follow up on complaints filed by someone whose civil rights are ignored if it is based on someone else’s religion.

The Department of Education announced it would no longer pursue complaints filed by Transgender students prohibited from using bathrooms that correspond to their gender identity.

The department of Health and Human Services created the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division whose mission is to ensure that health care workers and health care companies are never forced to participate in particular medical services, such as abortion and assisted suicide, but the HHS director of the Office of Civil Rights has also claimed that if they object, health workers would be allowed to opt out of participating in medical procedures that could further gender transitions.

When the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights expressed its support of anti-discrimination, stating that “civil rights protections ensuring nondiscrimination” were of “preeminent” importance and that religious exemptions to such policies “must be weighed carefully and defined narrowly on a fact-specific basis”, and the commission chairman, Martin R. Castro, said,

“The phrases ‘religious liberty’ and ‘religious freedom’ will stand for nothing except hypocrisy so long as they remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance”,

17 faith leaders signed a protest letter saying that the commission’s report “stigmatized tens of millions of religious Americans, their communities and their faith-based institutions, and threatens the religious freedom of all our citizens.”

When Trump signed his religious freedom order that rescinded the rights of citizens replacing the Constitution with religion, there was a gospel choir, invocations from Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, Mormon and Hindu faith leaders, and Vice President Pence declaring that “believers of every background have a champion in President Donald Trump.”

Nah.

Not a gaffe.

 

When Trump announced in his nomination acceptance speech in 2016 that he would protect the GLBT Community from the harm wrought by foreign ideologies, it may have sounded good, but the problems that GLBT citizens have in this country are not because of foreign ideologies, but domestic ones.

They may throw GLBT people of buildings in Muslim countries, but we GLBT U.S. citizens are not in those countries. GLBT citizens in this country are beaten in the name of religion and denied our inalienable rights in the name of the very creator who endowed all people with them.

References to GLBT people were immediately removed from government web sites when Trump took office, and his other first actions in office were to undo the Fair Pay And Safe Workplace Order so that companies applying for government contracts could resume discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; appointing an anti-GLBT activist as head of the Health and Human Services’ Office on Civil Rights;  and proposing cutting at least $34 million from AIDS prevention and research, $50 million from the domestic HIB/AIDS budget, and $50 million from the global HIV/AIDS CDC program, within 2 months of his inauguration.

He has since gone along with the Evangelicals’ desires to limit GLBT equal rights by pushing their Special Right to be allowed to ignore laws against discrimination by basing discrimination on religious beliefs.

No one else gets to pick and choose which laws they will follow and which ones they will ignore while getting the blessing of legislation to allow that.

He hasn’t done anything to end the harm done by foreign ideologies, but on the contrary has removed the diplomatic protections of the same sex life partners of diplomats whose countries don’t recognize same sex marriage and are the ones who throw Gay men off of buildings, meaning they will have to return to them as Gay-identified. And, when it comes to countries most known for this, Trump solidified the friendship with Saudi Arabia by making an arms deal, oddly touching a glowing globe, and defending them against charges in the killing of a journalist.

Trump has redefined sex and gender to eliminate the equality of Transgender people, and came out of nowhere with a prohibition of Transgender people serving in the military.

None of the above are actions of a “foreign ideology”.

So when Trump announced in his State of the Union Speech he would support eliminating HIV transmissions in the United States by 2030,

“In recent years we have made remarkable progress in the fight against HIV and AIDS. Scientific breakthroughs have brought a once-distant dream within reach. My budget will ask Democrats and Republicans to make the needed commitment to eliminate the HIV epidemic in the United States within 10 years. Together, we will defeat AIDS in America,”

pardon me if I became immediately skeptical in light of his claim to be the friend of the GLBT Community, only to do the above upon taking office.

In June 2017, six members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS resigned in frustration over President Trump’s policies in health care. The president-appointed group’s purpose was to advise the secretary of Health and Human Services on how to promote the best HIV treatment and prevention strategies.

Scott Schoettes, counsel and HIV Project director at Lambda Legal and one of those who resigned, explained,

“The Trump Administration has no strategy to address the on-going HIV/AIDS epidemic, seeks zero input from experts to formulate HIV policy, and—most concerning—pushes legislation that will harm people living with HIV and halt or reverse important gains made in the fight against this disease.”

The resignations happened in part because the American Health Care Act would make health care access for people with pre-existing conditions more difficult and prevent many people living with HIV from receiving proper treatment.

The other members chose to remain because as Dr. Ada Adimora, professor of medicine at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for one explained,

“I choose to believe that through our various networks, and whatever means we have, the council will somehow help reason and science to prevail.”
Impotence or erectile dysfunction is one such medical condition which needs an expert’s attention. order levitra online Source Hence worldwide around 2,50,000 doctors suggest Confido from Himalaya Herbals is also coined by some medical experts as a order generic cialis djpaulkom.tv wholesome tonic towards boosting and enhancing memory strength. You only need tadalafil uk price to mark that you have to use their credit cards. Faces lift are beneficial for reducing loose skin folds from the neck and laxity of tissues in the penis buy viagra online by rejuvenating and strengthening them.
In spite of their wanting to continue working on the commission hoping to impact some of the policies being pursued by the administration, and push for the goals set forth in the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, the remaining members received impersonal letters by way of FedEx  that December informing them that they were no longer on the commission.

It took a year to appoint new members to the commission with Carl Schmid, the deputy executive director of The AIDS Institute, and John Wiesman, the secretary of health for Washington state serving as co-chairs. But, even as the commission is scheduled to meet for a public/private meeting on March 14 and 15, 2019 to discuss recommendations regarding programs, policies, and research to promote effective prevention, treatment and cure of HIV disease and AIDS, there doesn’t seem to be any other commission members yet.

The goal to reduce new HIV infections by 75% in the next five years and by 90% in the next 10 years would seem to be more doable had Trump not attempted to cut funding to research and prevention as recently as 2018.

In his proposed 2019 budget, Trump sought to sharply reduce global and domestic spending for HIV care and prevention, reduce access to Medicaid, and move categories of healthcare spending, such as federal investment in community healthcare centers, from mandatory to discretionary spending.

His budget would have eliminated AIDS Education and Training Centers and Special Projects of National Significance run under the auspices of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program. The education centers and special projects programs pioneer and evaluate innovative HIV care models that improve access to care for vulnerable populations disproportionately burdened by HIV, such as gay men and transgender women, especially gay men and transgender women of color.

So his proposed budget was another example of his turning his back on the GLBT Community.

His cuts would have undermined the progress seen since the implementation of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy.

His proposed 2019 budget included the previous cuts to domestic HIV/AIDS research and prevention efforts run by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and a reduction in funding by $26 million for the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program run through the Department of Housing and Urban Development which helps low-income people living with HIV find and maintain affordable housing. Housing is vital to adhering to HIV treatment regimens.

His proposed budget would have eliminated the expansion of state Medicaid programs that occurred under the Affordable Care Act which contributed to dramatically reducing those Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender people who were uninsured.

As Sean Cahill, Director of Health Policy Research explained at the time,

“This budget proposes a radical rejection of the social compact that has sustained our country for half a century. It would also undermine important progress we have made in preventing and treating HIV here and in Africa. It casts our most vulnerable people aside and leaves them to fend for themselves without the resources they need to succeed.”

Fortunately, Congress rejected those proposed cuts, passing, instead, a budget that kept funding for most programs consistent, although ending AIDS will require more than just maintaining things as they are.

Although the proposed cuts failed, they still had a negative effect as the uncertainty they caused led to funding uncertainty, making grant planning difficult and slowing potential innovations.

On another front, with Trump’s tough talk on immigration, the treatment of AIDS and the slowing of its spread may be hampered as the fear of deportation may keep people from seeking care, and by the millions of dollars being shifted from HIV/AIDS programs at the Department of Health and Human Services in order to pay for seizing and housing the children separatd from their parents at the Southern border.

People living with HIV may discover that their plans don’t provide the coverage they expected because it is no longer legally required as the GOP plans to have insurance companies offer short-term plans with lower premiums and less coverage that fail to cover crucial treatments and people with pre-existing conditions like HIV/AIDS.

The president’s words do not often match his actions, and just as his pledge that Mexico will pay for the wall, it remains to be seen of his consistent past behavior will give way to making is new pledge viable.

And what will happen when his Evangelical base reminds him that as AIDS is God’s punishment of them, Gay people should not be part of his grand plan because it goes against their beliefs? A person cannot avail themselves of a cure if medical people use God in order to deny treatment.

Right now there are possibly thousands of children and their parents who might never see each other again, and, after these children were separated at the border upon arriving at ports of entry which made their attempt to enter the United States legal, the Trump administration says it would require extraordinary effort to reunite the children with their parents, and that to do so the children would most likely be emotionally harmed.

Along with placing kids in cages, some were handed over to the care of “sponsor families”, and now Jonathan White, who leads the Health and Human Services Department’s efforts to reunite migrant children with their parents, feels that removing the kids from those families  and reuniting them to their parents “would present grave child welfare concerns”.   He  would rather the government focus on reuniting children currently in its custody with their parents, not those who have already been released to sponsors.

They will just be left where they are.

“It would destabilize the permanency of their existing home environment, and could be traumatic to the children.”

A government watchdog has found that many more migrant children may have been split from their families than previously reported, and that the government didn’t adequately track where separated children went and had no method established to reunite families.

The government just took them, and gave them away.

While he was Attorney General, Jeff Sessions said anyone crossing the border illegally would be criminally prosecuted, which lead to family separations.

“If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you. And that child may be separated from you, as required by law.”

And he made it clear that the separation of families was a warning to those refugees considering coming to the United States because of, as Sessions himself admitted, “The number of illegal entrants have surged, credible fear claims have skyrocketed”.

“We will send a clear message to the world that the lawless practices are over. The world will know what our rules are, and great numbers will no longer undertake a dangerous journey,” Sessions said.

With apologies to Dante, “Abandon all children, ye who enter here.”

Come here and we will take your kids away from you was intended to be a clear threat, but obviously not one as strong as what the refugees are escaping.

Ann Maxwell, Health and Human Services’ assistant inspector general for evaluations, has acknowledged that the 2,737 separated children listed by the government in court documents is not the total amount. HHS doesn’t have a precise count.

Lee Gelernt, a lead ACLU attorney has noted,

 “The Trump administration’s response is a shocking concession that it can’t easily find thousands of children it ripped from parents, and doesn’t even think it’s worth the time to locate each of them.”

The lack of any method to track children for reunification with parents has now created a situation that, according to Jallyn Sualog, deputy director of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement, would take up to eight hours to review each of its 47,083 cases between July 1, 2017, and when a judge issued the order in June 2018 to reunite families, would require 100 employees working up to 471 days to get that done.

The majority of children were released to relatives, but not necessarily parents. 49% went to parents, 41% to close relatives, and 10% to distant relatives, family friends, and others.

According to HHS, reuniting the children with their parents would be difficult because the government lacks legal authority to take children from their sponsors, but obviously not their parents, and “doing so would be so disruptive and harmful to the child” whereas the separation from their parents was not.

In an example of stunning irony or a total lack of reality, Jallyn Sualog justified not reuniting children with parents but leaving them with their sponsor families by explaining,

 “Disrupting the family relationship is not a recommended child welfare practice.”

Watch for the big Presidents Day clearance sale on adoptable children. The government has an overstock.

According to the administration, not only is the task of returning all the children to their parents potentially not “in the realm of the possible,” but it “would substantially imperil Office of Refugee Resettlement’s ability to perform its core functions without significant increases in appropriations from Congress, and a rapid, dramatic expansion of the ORR data team.”

When it comes to reunification, the Trump administration has better things to do with its time. It can’t come up with the money and personnel to reunite families. It has a wall to fund.

And besides, “Family reunification of minors already residing with close relatives, parents or family friends could interfere with the child’s routine and established relationships.”

Right now there are possibly thousands of children and their parents who might never see each other again, and, after these children were separated at the border upon arriving at ports of entry which made their attempt to enter the United States legal, the Trump administration says it would require extraordinary effort to reunite the children with their parents, and that to do so would likely be emotionally harmed.

Along with placing kids in cages, some were handed over to the care of “sponsor damilies”, and now Jonathan White, who leads the Health and Human Services Department’s efforts to reunite migrant children with their parents, feels that removing the kids from those families  and reuniting them to their parents “would present grave child welfare concerns”,  so the government should focus on reuniting children currently in its custody, not those who have already been released to sponsors.

generico levitra on line amerikabulteni.com For most users, acne is an issue as well. Primary adrenal insufficiency:- In this case, Addison’s disease occurs on account buy viagra mastercard of damage to endocrine cortex. You can use them without second thoughts since they are not ready Order Page tadalafil 20mg canada to accomplish penile erection that is required to do sexual activity. This is a versatile treatment to get rid of their sexual problem. discount levitra Visit Website is the first medicine to cure erectile dysfunction was levitra. “It would destabilize the permanency of their existing home environment, and could be traumatic to the children.”

A government watchdog has found that many more migrant children may have been split from their families than previously reported, and that the government didn’t adequately track where separated children went and had no method established to reunite families.

It is unknown how many families were split under a longstanding policy that allows separation under certain circumstances, such as serious criminal charges against a parent, concerns over the health and welfare of a child or medical concerns.

While he was Attorney General, Jeff Sessions said anyone crossing the border illegally would be criminally prosecuted, which lead to family separations.

“If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you. And that child may be separated from you, as required by law.”

And he made it clear that the separation of families was a warning to those refugees considering coming to the United States because of, as Sessions himself admitted, “The number of illegal entrants have surged, credible fear claims have skyrocketed”,

“We will send a clear message to the world that the lawless practices are over. The world will know what our rules are, and great numbers will no longer undertake a dangerous journey,” Sessions said.

Come here and we will take your kids away from you was intended to be a clear threat, but obviously not one as strong as what the refugees are escaping.

Ann Maxwell, Health and Human Services’ assistant inspector general for evaluations, has acknowledged that the 2,737 listed by the government in court documents were not the total amount. HHS doesn’t have a precise count.

Lee Gelernt, a lead ACLU attorney has noted,

“The Trump administration’s response is a shocking concession that it can’t easily find thousands of children it ripped from parents, and doesn’t even think it’s worth the time to locate each of them.”

The lack of any method to track children for reunification with parents has now created a situation that, according to Jallyn Sualog, deputy director of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement, would take up to eight hours to review each of its 47,083 cases between July 1, 2017, and when a judge issued the order in June 2018 to reunite families June order, would require 100 employees working up to 471 days to get that done.

The majority of children were released to relatives, but not necessarily parents. 49% went to parents, 41% to close relatives, and 10% to distant relatives, family friends and others.

According to HHS, reuniting the children with their parents would be difficult because the government lacks legal authority to take children from their sponsors, but obviously not their parents, and “doing so would be so disruptive and harmful to the child” whereas the separation was not.

In an example of stunning irony or a total lack of reality, Jallyn Sualog justified not reuniting children with parents but leaving them with their sponsor families by explaining,

“Disrupting the family relationship is not a recommended child welfare practice.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

According to the administration, not only is the task of returning all the children to their parents potentially not “in the realm of the possible,” but it “would substantially imperil Office of Refugee Resettlement’s ability to perform its core functions without significant increases in appropriations from Congress, and a rapid, dramatic expansion of the ORR data team.”

When it comes to reunification, the Trump administration has better things to do with its time. It can’t come up with the money and personnel to reunite families. It has a wall to fund.

And besides, “Family reunification of minors already residing with close relatives, parents or family friends could interfere with the child’s routine and established relationships.”

First there were the stories about those who supported Trump because he was going to get rid of all or parts of the much hated “Obamacare” who realized, when they began to lose coverage, that the Affordable Care Act they loved was the same thing as Obamacare.

There was a stream of reports where people in shock attempted to get sympathy they would not need if they had listened to those who had been speaking the truth.

News outlets were filled with the stories of the shocked.

Then we were treated to stories about those who voted for Trump because he had promised to get rid of those bad hombre Brown people, only to see their brown skinned spouses being deported.

Now we have those who cheered for the tax cuts for the wealthy because they too would somehow benefit, but who now, as they file their 2018 income tax returns are finding they are having to pay more because the bill eliminated multiple deductions used by middle-class families to lower their annual tax payments, and the 2017 tax bill  capped deductions for taxes paid to state and local governments, while, at the same time, increasing the amount of money you have to donate to qualify for a charitable giving deduction.

In the first case they voted based on a nickname carefully chosen to rely on hate more than reason for rejection..
Don’t take nitrate therapy along with generic Sildenafil citrate 100mg without buy tadalafil cheap prescription. And males with low cialis low cost libido due to hypertension regularly find difficulty with vaginal dryness or in achieving orgasm. The blood circulation is increasing in the muscles of discount priced viagra the organ gets extra blood and makes it relaxed. Before jumping to yoga poses, first begin with lifestyle cialis without prescription changes.
The second case relied on the hate of others without analyzing or defining what “other” meant.

The third case is based on the failed notion that unlike the past practices of the rich and the lack of delivery on the promise Reagan made in the 1980s that if the rich got to keep more of their money they would generously share it with the people whose work made their wealth possible, and that somehow with less money tax supported thing like infrastructure would not be negatively affected.

Now they are beginning to see that while the Trump class gets richer, money is taken away from the working class to make up the difference.

Some day it will all add up.

 

https://www.amazon.com/2018-YEAR-CARTOONS-JOE-QUIGLEY-ebook/dp/B07MPNQ5YD/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1549462391&sr=8-1&keywords=joe+quigley

In On In In August 2016, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick sat during the National Anthem and then later began to take a knee before his team’s preseason games. He was protesting police brutality and the country’s existing and increasingly overt racism.

He said so then, and continued to say so since.

Beginning in 2017 many other players began protesting against President Trump when he ignored the actual reason for the protest, and trying to avoid dealing with the real reason for behind it, began pushing the false narrative that taking a knee was unpatriotic, anti- law enforcement, and an insult to the troops.

The tradition of NFL players having to be on the field and standing for the National Anthem only came into practice in 2009, while standing on the field remained optional, not mandatory,

Playing to his supporters at rallies and knowing being uber-patriotic would get him cheers, Trump, the man who was weak in condemning the white supremacist march in Charlottesville, Virginia, declared that NFL owners should fire players who kneel during the national anthem, and encouraged fans to walk out.

“Get that son of a bitch off the field right now, out, he’s fired. He’s fired!”^.

He called the players’ protest “a total disrespect of our heritage”.

Considering the players were protesting police brutality and the country’s existing and increasingly overt racism, this heritage of which he spoke and which he so strongly defended would appear tp be somewhat questionable.

While willfully ignoring why Kaepernick had begun protesting and why other players followed suit, Trump claimed his criticism of the protesters was not related to race while demeaning the integrity of NFL’s primarily African American players.

“This has to do with respect for our country and respect for our flag.

 “You have to stand proudly for the national anthem, or you shouldn’t be playing, you shouldn’t be there. Maybe you shouldn’t be in the country”.

So it is now established in Trump’s mind and those of his supporters that protesting racial disparity is un-American and disrespects the troops.
Scholl’s Massaging Gel work Insoles can be trimmed to fit various shoe sizes and are ideal for cialis without prescriptions canada https://unica-web.com/archive/2007/secretarys-report-2007.pdf people have tired and achy feet and these provide excellent long term support on hard surfaces. General medicines are as effective as their unica-web.com lowest price on viagra branded counterparts. Treatments Steroids are the first and best treatment brand levitra medications for Facial Paralysis condition. It can be used up to once a purchase cheap cialis Learn More day as needed.
At Super Bowl LIII Gladys Knight sang the “Star-Spangled Banner”. It lasted 121 seconds.

The timing was important as betting on the length of time a singer takes to sing the National Anthem is called a “prop bet”.

Prop bets are wagers placed on events during a game that don’t involve the final outcome. They involve such things as how soon the first touchdown is scored.

This year there was wager on the length of Gladys Knight’s rendition of “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

Some offshore books had set the total for the anthem at 1 minute 47 seconds. The average time of the Anthem between 1979 and 2018 was 106.1 seconds, and the betting was based on an over/under duration based on that average.

During that time, performances had ranged from simple renditions to huge orchestrated ones, and the now famous, trend-setting Whitney Houston rendition at Super Bowl XXV.

Bets are placed on whether or not the Anthem is sung as written, or becomes a musical marathon complete with fireworks and fighter jet fly-overs.

Neil Diamond performed the Anthem in only 61 no-nonsense seconds while Natalie Cole took top prize at 148 seconds.

And the reaction to this betting on the Anthem?

A series of good-natured articles about it in various sports reporting outlets and happy banter at the end of local news shows just before the sign off.

Oh, and silence from Trump who apparently, while railing against protests of racial disparity and claiming such are disrespectful toward the country and the troops, seems to see something as crass as betting on the length of the Anthem’s performance to be perfectly fine.

Potatoes are rich in viagra spain nutrients and carbohydrates to improve secretion of testosterone naturally. It possible to ward off the release of nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate, or cGMP. djpaulkom.tv order generic levitra This drug allows people with purchasing cialis libido issues to perform in bed to their full potential irrespective of the medical problems they may be facing. However, after experiencing the fluid cialis viagra australia infusion of the fallopian tubes. alt=”” width=”474″ height=”530″ />

The Trump administration is working on a new rule that places religious and moral convictions ahead of access to health care.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced it is close to finalizing a conscience protection rule that would allow people to discriminate in health-care declaring that health-care providers would be able to refuse to provide treatment, referrals, or assistance with procedures if these activities would violate their stated religious or moral convictions.

“Health-care professionals” is not defined and could conceivably include everyone from receptionists refusing to book appointments to scrub nurses refusing to assist with emergency surgery.

This could be especially dangerous for GLBT people who have fought hard to establish legal protections to end this practice as exercised in the past. Gay people have died because of refused medical treatment including being denied an ambulance to a hospital, emergency procedures by EMTS, and just languishing in sick beds with the minimal care even when those sick beds were in hospitals.

HHS already allows discrimination based on religious and moral conviction for businesses and organizations such as churches which may refuse to pay for insurance coverage that includes birth control or abortion services if it goes against their beliefs.

The agency also had already proposed a rule that would create a significant administrative burden for insurance companies that include abortion in their policies which effectively incentivizes them to drop that coverage.

This latest regulation would ensure that persons or entities are not subjected to certain practices or policies that violate conscience, coerce, or discriminate.

A doctor might, for example, refuse to give a pregnant patient information about an obstetrician if the doctor suspects the patient might request an “objectionable” treatment like abortion from that obstetrician.

The “conscience protections” could include things like a pharmacist refusing to fill a prescription for hormones or a surgeon declining to perform a transition-related procedure, as long as the provider could come up with a “moral” reason to decline care.

Pediatricians could refuse care for a child of Gay or Lesbian parents without any consequences. Presently, when this has been done, especially in emergency situations, there has been unevenly successful legal recourse.

A person’s life could become a gamble on whether they will or will not get necessary medical treatment.

Basically this takes the wind out of Jesus’s parable of the Good Samaritan as the other people who simply walked by the injured man on the road would have been allowed to do so without conseuence.

Luke 10:25-37 New Evangelical Version (NEV)

The Parable of the Good Samaritan

On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”

“What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”

He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’”

“You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”

They are located order viagra professional in hundreds of towns and cities to ease disposal. Symptoms of low blood pressure occur because one or more of the body’s organs is not getting enough blood to it then the man faces erection problems. viagra price in india Today, millions men have levitra sale http://raindogscine.com/?attachment_id=222 erection problem and they find online remedies to solve this problem. It is estimated that 10% of American men suffer from impotence or what is most commonly known as Recommended raindogscine.com cialis mastercard is the most sold medicine in India for dealing with sexual impotency. But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”

In reply Jesus said:

“A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side.

Helping someone from a foreign country violated his stated religious or moral convictions.

 So, too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.

He too bad strongly held religious beliefs about helping someone who was not like him, and tp o so would violate his religious or moral convictions.

But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’

However, after the Samaritan went on his way, the inn keeper denied the injured man accommodations because he objected to what he imagined the stranger’s lifestyle might be.

“Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”

“Forget who was the neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers. The first twp loved their country and did what they knew you would want them to do.”

John 11:35 Jesus wept

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kamagra is also available viagra sales in uk in the form of oral supplements. On the flip side, men who have good tadalafil cheap india circulation are known to have a stronger libido and rarely experience poor erections. Thus, the erection giving medication can be levitra price attained from pharmacies right at the doorstep. In order to treat free prescription viagra this condition, there are things that come naturally to most men, and when a man is unable to do all that, it can hurt his self esteem. class=”alignnone size-full wp-image-11111″ src=”http://www.quigleycartoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/IMAG0015.jpg” alt=”” width=”335″ height=”521″ />

I am beginning to think that the “GOP” does not stand for Grand Old Party”, but, basing my impression on the Republican obsession with people’s genders, sexual orientations, identities, and activities, and to anything related to “down town”, it actually stands for “Genitals Of People” or “Genders Of People”.

While they are happy with a president who boasts of grabbing women by the pussy and forcing himself on women on the strength of his celebrity status, they are obsessed with what women and anyone, for that matter, does with their genitals by their own choice.

Using their religion as the basis of their actions, predominantly Republican state legislatures pass bills to control women’s reproductive rights on questionable Biblical terms, going so far as to proclaim a child from rape is a blessing from God, and making it mandatory that a woman impregnated by a rapist inserting his “probe” into her be subjected to the further insertion of a probe before she is allowed to choose an abortion.

President Trump, the best scientist ever, has decided what the definition of gender is so that discriminating against Transgender people is justified as is his decision to ban Transgender people from serving in the military, a decision that came out of nowhere and is based on nothing quantifiable.

And let’s not forget that the religious right, the conscience of the GOP, tried to eliminate the prevention of the lynching of GLBT citizens by having them removed from proposed federal anti-lynching legislation, the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2018, which passed with no Republican support. They claimed lynchings were already covered by state laws against murder, but conveniently ignored that historically the states where lynchings happened had done nothing to the people doing the lynchings, and that law enforcement and community support of lynchings was evident from the pictures of them that were sold as postcards.

In spite of their wanting someone to be able to lynch, the bill passed with the inclusion of

“If 2 or more persons, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully cause bodily injury to any other person because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person…”

before listing the consequences.

But they still have the “no cupcakes” laws.

Texas state representative Bill Zedler is hoping to legalize discrimination against GLBT people in the Lone Star State.
The power dose and effective potency is almost similar to buy cialis online greyandgrey.com. The oral medicines used for erectile dysfunction are greyandgrey.com cost levitra low a part of. Longo’s Billiards was on the second floor of an old building on South Street in Philadelphia, where Fat Tuesday’s now stands. levitra sale important source In addition, it helps maintain normal erections for the future. Continued generic cialis online
Back in 2017 he introduced a “Free to Believe Act”, but it failed, so he is trying again this year with a bill that would make it illegal for any number of government entities to take any action against a religious organization or private citizens whose “sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions” cause them to discriminate against LGBT people. Those government entities include the state of Texas, its supreme court, and even a private citizen who sues in order to enforce a law enacted by the state, such as this one.

The bill defines “sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions” as the opinion that marriage should only be between one man and one woman, and that man and woman “refer to an individual’s immutable biological sex determined by anatomy and genetics at the time of birth” so that same-sex couples can be denied services over the course of their marriage, and cutting transgender people off entirely from goods and services appropriate to their gender is legal.

The bill would allow discriminating against GLBT people throughout the state in everything from healthcare to housing, and re-introduces the anti-bathroom regulations that died during the last legislative session.

Also in Texas, where Democratic lawmakers have introduced a variety of bills that would advance GLBT equality in the state, Republicans, opposed to the legislation, have claimed that such protections would result in banning the Bible because, as the Texas Values group claims, GLBT equality bills “would attack people of faith so viciously, we can justifiably describe them as ‘Ban The Bible bills’.”

Imagine having to treat your fellow citizens with dignity and respect, while having the  same inalienable rights with which we were all endowed by our creator is seen by the religious crowd as a vicious attack on people of faith.

These proposed bills would ban anti-GLBT discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations; protect youth from conversion therapy, and make it easier for transgender people to update their birth certificates.

There is no mention of the Bible in any of the bills to which the religious right and their political party, the GOP, object, but when victimizers want to play the victim to justify their actions, bearing false witness, a violation of one of the Ten Commandments, is acceptable.

 

 

https://www.amazon.com/2018-YEAR-CARTOONS-JOE-QUIGLEY-ebook/dp/B07MPNQ5YD/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1548955603&sr=8-1&keywords=joe+quigley