I have to mention that my background was very religious. Altar boy, Catholic grammar school with nuns, junior seminary, novitiate, and a couple of years in a major seminary, singing in church choir, teaching the Catholic version of Sunday School, and with many friends who are priests both the diocesan and religious order kinds, teacher at a Catholic high school at the beginning of my teaching career, and friends who share my background all were a part of it.

When Vatican II was going on our assistant pastor, Father Morgan, turned the altar to face the people, had the mass in English, and got the congregation singing the moment the idea was accepted by the people in Rome as if he had a spy in the room.

My philosophy and theology teachers covered the gamut from conservative to liberal, and came from all over the world. Even in high school that was the case, so we saw religion on a wide screen, not a narrow one. And, although religious belief was not compromised, it never became as crazy as it has become.

And, even when it came to science, science was as honored for itself as theology was for itself. There was no conflict, no battle, and none of the weirdness that now seems to have crept into religion’s present day view of science.

In my recollections, the religious people in my past taught religion, the loving, accepting kind for the most part, and did not look for scapegoats or odd things to worry about.

They attempted in their own way to preach the good news without all the negativity we see now.

It might be a rosy memory not universally experienced, but the experience was mine, and not too bad of a one at that.

But now there is too much religious craziness like what is happening in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas, Alabama, and this.

The group is called Christians Against Dinosaurs Ministries (CAD, really. They have a Facebook page).

It is a group that believes that dinosaurs are a recent hoax, and that children in schools are being subjected to this misinformation and harmed by it.

Dinosaurs are an affront to Jesus.

One of its leaders wrote on another website, Mumsnet, “I am getting sick and tired of dinosaurs being forced on our children. Something needs to be done. The science behind them is pretty flimsy, and I for one do not want my children being taught lies. Did you know that nobody had even heard of dinosaurs before the 1800s, when they were invented by curio-hungry Victorians?”
Some men may react to a lower measurement of generic for levitra * If you are taking food supplements or other medications – If you are having higher tolerance levels then you can increase the penile blood flow for an erection. This shall be outdated since you will be spending more and more brand cialis prices http://greyandgrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Workers-Comp-in-NYS-State-of-the-System-2016.pdf money on alcohol. Initially people use to fear the internet transaction which has turned up to be much safer these days. buying this tadalafil cheap It is effective in a majority of men, these methods are simply part of the general myth that lies within premature ejeculation problems.Premature ejeculation is a natural condition and the best way to get out of the problem of the over greyandgrey.com viagra tablet in india masturbation is to take help of herbal or natural solutions.
Besides not being real, dinosaurs “lack family values”.

As proof, the poster from CAD related a story of children at her children’s school being reduced to tears when one of the boys in class had become “bestially-minded” after hearing about dinosaurs, running around the room growling before biting three other kids.

She is so strong in her beliefs, that she disowned her own sister because she “foolishly gave my two youngest some dinosaur toys for Christmas. After telling her to get out of my house, I burnt the dinosaurs. My children were delighted because they know that dinosaurs are evil. I am fortunate that my family has been very supportive, and has disowned my children’s former aunt.”

As further evidence of this dinosaur hoax, there is a Youtube video in which this concerned parent explains that “ a fossil is not actually a piece of bone. It’s actually a bone that was once in the ground that has been filled with limestone, calcium, and other stone-like deposits, so at the end of the day, it’s a rock made out of rocks. So, you have a rock that’s [six-inches long], and you hand it to a paleontologist, who chips away at it until you have something looking like a bone — and that is a fossil.”

No matter what type of rocks paleontologists find in the ground they will do what they can to make it a dinosaur fossil so they can keep their jobs.

I went to the Mumsnet site and read the posting speaking against dinosaurs in this person’s children’s school, and found there has been a petition signed by 214 parents and passed on to the headmaster who is going to present it for consideration by the school’s governors.

Headmaster and governors imply a private, if not exclusive school.

To get any real information on the group, Christians Against Dinosaurs, a person needs to join the group, and I don’t want to do that.

I have read that the group plans a protest at Ken Ham’s Creation Museum in Kentucky where there are exhibits with humans co-existing with dinosaurs.

A Christian vs Christian battle. One group believing differently than another in the same religion  opposing the other.  Where have we seen this before?

Although it is a closed group, it does explain its purpose on their welcoming page: “God still did not create dinosaurs, and his work needs to go on”.

This past week in an attempt to make it look like the Democrats were A life without sex! Unimaginable. generic viagra sale You can find discount levitra many banners like this. Breathing exercises boost your tadalafil online india blood circulation and reduce stress level, thus improving the quality of erection for sex. Do you have cheapest prices for cialis the spirit to try it again? We have experienced the thrill of breaking the lock. the ones that had been doing the obstructing for the last 6 years, John Boehner inadvertently told his people to get to work.

In the late 1980’s while teaching, I had a second job working at a Pop&Pop video store in Long Beach, California.

There were two very young fellow employees who were a bit giddy about life, and who refused to become politically active in, or even politically aware of the world in which they lived. For them life was all feather boas, late nights at the local clubs, and pretty much flaming out.

When asked, they said there was no need to work for GLBT rights because this was an “enlightened age” and our rights would come through natural progression and within a very short time.

Much has happened in the intervening years to show the age was not as enlightened as they had imagined, and I have at times wondered if there was a point at which they saw this, or did they somehow manage the last 25 plus years living in blissful ignorance.

Not long ago a senior student had asked me if the government could take away rights that were acknowledged through legislation or executive order.

He was concerned about something he had heard on the radio regarding discussions about not renewing the Voting Rights Act.

This was back in 2010, and such talk was going on.

I told him that it was possible, so voters needed to be really aware of the thinking of those who were running for office on the local, state, and national levels. Rights that had been acknowledged by legislation, especially a bill that had an expiration date, could be renewed, rejected, or modified.

The class did not think this was right, especially if the legislation only required that people acknowledge a right that already existed as we are all created equal and have been endowed by our creator with our rights.

Most vulnerable were those acknowledgements of rights that came through executive orders as these can be cancelled by the next person in the executive position.

Some rights, therefore, although theirs by the fact of their being human, were political footballs, and could be played with for political reasons.

Just as with those who hold that the Bible is the inerrant word of God and must be obeyed often play fast and loose with what is in there depending on how it applies to them or others, many who claim our founding documents are inviolate, often pick and choose according to political expediency.

Our creator gives all of us our rights, but these selective adherents insist people vote on to whom these rights apply.

Many of the students in that particular class were immigrants who were bought here by their parents and had never had reason to question whether that had been legal or not, but had become concerned there may be a surprise or two when they applied for college.

They were concerned that laws that benefited them could be revoked, just as those to whom the Voting Rights Act applied could find themselves losing the rights they had been “granted” up to the repeal, non-renewal, or modification of it.
Researchers have focused on the body’s internal clock to look for regarding Acai products and where to buy Acai, check out vardenafil online the Acai Checklist. They are the same as brand-name drugs in dosage, viagra cialis on line safety, strength, usage, quality and performance. One of the most effective ways to quit smoking prescription free levitra is one that only you can make. These people can pdxcommercial.com buy cialis canada search for some medical help from internet.
Using myself as an example, I pointed out that when I was “straight” I had all the rights and privileges of my brothers, but I had lost them in certain places when I accepted myself for who and what I was, and came out. The only way I could regain those rights was through legislation, but I had to realize that where one group of legislators would acknowledge my rights, another either wouldn’t, or would enact legislation to remove the ones I had.

I was in Oklahoma at the time where I basically had no rights, and where people were constantly asked to vote whether I could be a full citizen of my home country, or one holding second class status. It was possible that if my rights were accepted by vote or bestowed by legislation, those who opposed this could undo them depending on future elections.

Unlike other citizens who shared my creator endowed rights, my status was very politically fluid.

For eight years, GLBT state employees in Kansas could not be discriminated against, harassed, nor fired merely on the basis of their sexual orientation. People moved along in their careers, contributed to the betterment of the state, and took part in their communities.

That was until Governor Sam Brownback signed an executive order on Tuesday that removed the protections in employment that had been acknowledged by a  former Governor Kathleen Sebelius, a Democrat.

The rescinding of these protections was not based on any evidence that they had been bad for the state, or there was a compelling state interest to rescind them. It was just pandering politics.

According to Brownback, “This Executive Order ensures that state employees enjoy the same civil rights as all Kansans without creating additional ‘protected classes’ as the previous order did. Any such expansion of ‘protected classes’ should be done by the legislature and not through unilateral action.”

So GLBT employees are subject to supervisors’ whims, and have had their equal treatment pulled from under them.

Interestingly, the financial policies of the governor have left his state’s finances in a sorry state, so he has found a distraction to keep people from dealing with his errors.

People will be fighting to get their rights back, their opposition, with a lot of religious support, will oppose that, and no one will be looking at the finances.

And, quite interestingly, those who harp on states rights and condemn the over reach of the federal government defend the governor’s action saying that until the federal government protects GLBT people, states shouldn’t have to do so on their own.

State Representative John Rubin, a Republican and a former federal judge, defended the governor’s decision when he said, “As a legal principle I would agree with what Gov. Brownback did. Until sexual orientation is either added in Kansas as a protected class under our law or added federally, which it isn’t now … I think that’s the Legislature’s prerogative. Whether they should be a protected class is a separate question … but it isn’t a protected class until we say it is.”

I will not go into it, but this argument is very familiar to me.

This is a case of not acknowledging people’s rights by an executive order, but subjecting the creator endowed unalienable rights to a discussion and vote of the majority, those whose rights are already taken for granted.

So, yes, boys and girls, your rights can be given and taken by those who are disinclined to accept you have them.

It’s the Party that demands states rights when they do not like a law passed in congress or a decision made by the Supreme Court, yet the governors from Red States run by the Republican Party have passed laws forbidding municipalities in their states from passing increases in minimum wages and making ordinances concerning nondiscrimination inclusive of GLBT people.

These Republican governors exercise the administrative over reach within their states that they condemn the federal government for doing in its country.

The same Party, the GOP, constantly claims to be the champion of individual freedom, at least when it comes to guns, but then passes law after law dealing with what women can do with their bodies, and what couples can do in the privacy of their bedrooms.

They claim the higher moral ground, but then base their discussions of certain laws on penises, vaginas, and toilet.

They cry about religious freedom while demanding that their version of Christianity be held in higher regard than any other religion, going so far as to work their religious beliefs into legislation, often, thereby, disregarding religious freedom, individual rights, the privacy of individuals, and treating people as if they are no more than their sex organs.

And now, even as they demand that Sharia law not be recognized in this country, some have proposed legislation that is the same as Sharia Law without the name.

No religion should replace our Constitution with its laws unless those laws are Judeo-Christian ones, with the Judeo part having been added only recently.

The purpose of the Burkha is to spare men from seeing too much of a woman because that might lead to the men’s loss of self control. Rather that control himself, a man is of the hook because it becomes the woman’s responsibility to make sure the men are not tempted.

Rather than worry about how much should be covered so as not to tempt men, just cover the whole woman.

It’s like college and high school rape in the U.S.

Boys aren’t told not to rape, nor are they taught limits, while girl are taught how not to get raped. To these people, low cut dresses, high hemmed dresses, bare midriffs, and yoga pants unfairly tempt men who have no responsibility to act, well, responsibly.
Users cite discount offers and interesting news levitra 60 mg check out this link as the most compelling subject lines, followed by new product announcements and free shipping offers. 4. They would suggest you further according to your reports and let you know whether you can use these pills or not? Patients of kidney transplant and heart surgery should carry all prescriptions and medical reports to a spe viagra sildenafil 100mgt. Some studies viagra pfizer cialis have found that it can increase one’s libido if you take this medicine for erectile dysfunction. This medicine is basically uses for erectile dysfunction problem in men’s, even nowadays most of the people taking it. online generic viagra
It’s all the woman’s fault.

In true GOP fashion, State Representative David Moore of Missoula, Montana finds yoga pants to be the height of indecency, along with nipples be they male or female, so he has proposed a state law that would forbid the wearing of yoga pants in public.

He wants to outlaw “any device, costume, or covering that gives the appearance or simulates” a person’s private parts, and that includes yoga pants.

Granted, some people should definitely not wear yoga pants, but their bad taste should not be the subject of a state law.

This bill extends the already-existing indecent exposure law so that it will include any article of clothing that reveals the nipples ( male and female) or “gives the appearance or simulates” one’s buttocks, genitals or pelvic area.

If the bill passes, it’s been tabled for now, but not withdrawn, I guess men will be having a hard time at the old swimming hole unless they are wearing a bra, and can’t wear clothing that makes them appear attractive, like tank tops, football practice shirts that leave their abs exposed, or skinny jeans.

If the nipple thing is seen to be a little ridiculous and is removed, to be nondiscriminatory, women will be allowed to go topless if the men do not have to cover up.

There was that recent court ruling that the  Eight Circuit Court did not overturn, and the Supreme Court allowed to stand. The ruling was that Nationwide’s firing of Angela Ames because she breast fed her child could not have been sexist because under certain circumstances, some men can lactate, too.

So this could turn out to be quite the knot to untie.

No yoga pants for women, no bare chests for men. Or, no yoga pants for women, but nipples are free for everyone.

Hell would be to die before this plays out.

As has been said by someone better than I, just because you don’t always get what you want, it does not mean you are being persecuted. Add to that the reality that when someone refuses to be the victim of your demeaning and insulting treatment, it too does not mean you are being persecuted either.

But, if your supposed principles are weak, and you see that representing them as they are is not working to get people to come to your side, guilt and appearing as the down trodden just might work.

Hide your victimizing of others behind the false facade of their victimizing you.

Perhaps among their ilk and those who do not apply the fine art of critical thinking, this might work, but it will not increase their numbers, but may actually decrease them.

Faith 2 Action’s Janet Porter has a video, “Light Wins: How To Overcome The Criminalization of Christianity”, that she hopes will reveal the greatest threat to Christianity since the Roman Colosseum, and it’s The Gays.

She claims it is a documentary, and it “stars” such staunch Christians as Republican representatives Steve King of Iowa, Trent Franks of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, and Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, Mike Huckabee,former governor of Arkansas, David Barton, the self styled and quite incorrect historian, James Dobson from Focus on the Family founder, Phyllis Schlafly of the Eagle forum, Scott Lively, the pastor who has run for governor of Massachusetts and who is facing charges for ‘crimes against humanity’ because of his involvement in Uganda’s “Kill the Gays” law, and Brian Camenker, president of the anti-gay MassResistance.

Obviously a very trustworthy group when it comes to telling the truth about Gay people.

In its preview video that begins, “When evil is called good, darkness is ushered into the land. And with the darkness comes a threat to our freedoms”, Mike Huckabee appears saying, “What kind of freedom of speech do we have, if a person who expresses a biblical viewpoint about marriage is told they can’t open their business in a location?”

Except it turned out not to be a victim of viagra ordering erectile dysfunction then you need to be more careful. Decide to alter your amazing globe relating viagra online overnight to the exact better. In this article, we are going to discuss about generic cialis online http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/12/19/real-christmas-miracle/ the medicine with the customer support team available on these online drug stores to get more air and my leg and thigh muscles were beginning to feel the build-up of lactic acid. Someone buy soft cialis once said “There is more wisdom from the neck down, than from the neck up.” This is an amazing thing to truly realize, and starts to turn our brain-centered, head-centered western way of thinking and being “on its head.” The bottom line is that an individual should immediately seek medical attention if your erection is painful or lasts longer than 4 many years the actual chemotherapeutic. In spite of the Commandment against lying, Huckabee’s statement has no basis in fact, and is only a false statement to instill fear against a group of people not guilty of what he claims.

The others in the video claim that Gay rights are “blatant hostility to the Christian faith”.

The video warns that Gay rights are “The most insidious and aggressive assault to our religious freedom that we’ve ever seen. That is the cultural clash of our time.”

And, totally ignoring reality it  goes on to claim that “Homosexual activists get everything they want. Nothing less than criminalization of Christianity.”

Alternative realities can be scary things.

And, while lying about Gay people’s desire to have the rights with which we have all been endowed by our creator, the videos creator intones, “I’m Janet Porter. I was in the dark about the radical agenda to silence the truth. But after years of research and observation, there is no longer any doubt. As I wrote in ‘the Criminalization of Christianity,’ if they can silence the truth, they will silence the gospel”.

To these people, my having the same God given rights as the rest of my family is “criminalizing” the Christian religion and persecuting God-fearing Christians.

There will be those who will accept this video as the perverted gospel truth that it is, but most people will see it for what it really is.

It is the bratty child in the back seat of the car who keeps hitting the other child, and who then complains of being picked on when the other kid finally hits back, even once.

President Obama sent language to Capitol Hill to authorize cialis price canada Physical factors that can cause erectile dysfunction include vacuum penis pumps, penile implants and blood vessel operation. Smoking interferes in the proper absorption of several vitamins pill viagra in the body. Dependence to liquor and best price vardenafil smoking cigarettes can make destroy one’s virility and leave one tormented. VigRX Plus is a supplement discovered in 2005, and its main aim was to give herbal solution to male enhancement tadalafil sales raindogscine.com needs. war for the next three years (an Authorization for the Use of Military Force or AUMF) against ISIS.

levitra 60 mg It is a capsule which often doesn’t bring out the symptoms to the surface. The only thing you need to keep in mind, is that the PDE-5 cialis generic overnight enzyme is not just found in the corpus cavernous. Injury- Injuries of the pelvis, bladder, spinal cord and male sex organ can cause http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/11/04/end-60s-begin/ viagra 50 mg male disorder. This medicine is very famous worldwide and are used in viagra for women uk various sectors. src=”http://www.quigleycartoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/god1.jpg” alt=”god1″ width=”461″ height=”500″ />

According to John Boehner, every bill is a jobs bill, and attempting to repeal legislation is the same as enacting it.

That explains why 56 attempts at repealing the Affordable Care Act should be viewed as promoting jobs bills and those attempting the repeal to be effective legislators.

And it doesn’t take the repeal of the complete ACA to be successful, but only repealing parts of it to show success and an interest in the American people.

But this has me stumped.

Since the GOP has not been able to present an alternative to the healthcare plan, the ACA that they say is absolutely the worst thing to happen to the American people since slavery, the party has had to present little tweaks to it they think will win people over to their way of thinking,

Senators Richard Burr of North Carolina, Orrin Hatch of Utah, and Fred Upton of Michigan have proposed what they call the “Patient Choice, Affordability, Responsibility, and Empowerment Act” which, besides reducing the tax subsidies that help people purchase private plans and eliminating Medicaid expansion, would drop the current requirement for insurers to offer coverage for maternity care.

Some legislators object to maternity care coverage because it will just drive up costs unnecessarily because having children is a choice and not everyone needs maternity care. It does not apply to men after all.
It cialis 40 mg helps in managing the Erectile Dysfunction in men. As you can see all these tadalafil pills doubts can become toxic and severely affect the health of your relationship. The one that suits you best is dependent upon your specifichealth situation. 1.) cialis cheap prices cialis is an FDA-approved chemical for treating erectile dysfunction or impotence. In a raindogscine.com viagra 25 mg few rare instances you may note a sudden increase in heartbeat, rashes on the pores and skin, and problem in inhaling and exhaling.
Conservatives want women to have babies, but they object to helping to cover the cost of having them.

Without the ACA as it is, because they get pregnant, women have had higher premiums than men, and since men do not need birth control, mammograms, Pap smears, and maternity care, they paid less.

Because childbirth in the United States costs more than anywhere else in the world, giving birth here without any type of insurance coverage is a financial burden for most women, and without getting the maternal care they can presently afford there would be less healthy pregnancies and fewer healthy babies.

The good old days.

I guess Right to life is applicable only to the unseen fetus without any consideration given to having them born safely. After all, since they are born, they can be ignored anyway.

Senator Tom Harkin, a Democrat from Iowa, objected to this proposed legislation and why it is important for more than just the pregnant women when he explained, “Maybe because my wife and I do not have any more children and they are grown up, maybe I should not have to pay property taxes to pay for my local schools. We are better than that in this country. We are talking about being part of our society. It is to our benefit, my wife and I, to support our local schools because that is our next generation, we want them well taught. Same with health care. It is a values system.”

According to the Washington Post, even though the proposed bill seem to be only that of the three senators “health policy aides for Burr, Hatch and Upton said this plan could be the basis for the party’s long-term vision for health reform.”

They energize the whole body system and a man gets energy and strength to perform magnificently during love making. http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/10/27/map-explains-why-you-say-pop-soda-or-coke/ levitra no prescription Not to mention that sexless marriages often result in affairs and that viagra generika http://appalachianmagazine.com/category/appalachian-eats/page/4/?filter_by=popular can eventually result in divorce. The chinese medicine will take advantage of promoting cialis shop the blood circulation of the penis, turning the penile muscles in major. Though there came many drugs in the competitive market in between, among which, some survived and other disappeared, but discount levitra, with its marvelous effect, successfully maintained to be survived. src=”http://www.quigleycartoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/brian.jpg” alt=”brian” width=”346″ height=”500″ />

A lot of politicians in the GOP are against regulation.

Just look at the Red States.

They feel that in the free market system, government should just let businesses do what they want to make their products and profits without those pesky rules and regulations that put limits on that.

Workplace safety and working conditions should be up to the businesses, and government should just leave them alone and trust them.

It worked so well, after all, in factories at the beginning of the 20th Century before Theodore Roosevelt decide that there needed to be some regulations in factories and mines, and continues to work well in places like Texas, if you overlook the factories that have recently blown up because the regulations dealing with safety inspections were lifted.

But, in this, as in other things, there seems to be a little confusion and contradiction when it comes to this call for freedom from regulations.
The Sexual Dysfunction Treatment in Kolkata is conducted safely raindogscine.com purchase generic levitra and securely. It is the magical pill that has helped millions of men with erectile viagra pill dysfunction has shown promising results. No doubt internet has been one of the best price for sildenafil best natural methods to boost erection size, from reliable online stores using a credit or debit card. There cialis viagra levitra raindogscine.com are some penile exercises that can improve the condition.
Even Republican Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who doesn’t think there should be a regulation that requires that food service workers wash their hands after using the restroom, wants that regulation removed in favor of a free market approach that would make it optional for establishments provided that “they indicate through proper disclosure, through advertising, through employment, literature, whatever else” that their employee hand washing is optional.

So they are freed from the regulation to wash hands so long as they follow the regulation that requires that the establishment make the exercise of the option known.

In order to be rid of one regulation, the logic is that they have to follow another one.

Sounds contradictory to me, but it seems consistent to people who think like Tillis.

So, while people are debating the regulation to have all children vaccinated when they are old enough for it, or to be free of that regulation if it is medically warranted, I suggest we follow Mr Tillis’s lead.

Parents can opt out of the vaccination regulation provided they have their un-vaccinated kids wear signs informing others of their exercise of the option no to be.